지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Globally researchers often do not disseminate their research results effectively to audiences so that they can understand them and can translate them into practice. This includes researchers who use both qualitative and quantitative methodologies. Failure to disseminate results well has a detrimental effect on the acquisition and uptake of new knowledge by health care practitioners and consumers. A growing body of literature focuses on disseminating evidence and translating this into practice, but often a significant gap still occurs (5~10 years) between data collection, the release of research findings, and the potential uptake in health settings. There is clear value in disseminating the results of good research. Sharing knowledge underpins an evidence base to change outdated practices, encourages other meaningful research projects, and exposes health consumers best practice environments.
Researchers have a duty of care to their participants, their profession, science, and health care, and accountability to funding bodies and the public for research funds and the dissemination of findings. If research results are not disseminated in effective ways, there is little value to the research being undertaken in the first place.
The reasons for non-dissemination or effective dissemination of results are numerous, including publishing in journals not accessible or understandable to practitioners, and not using a wide variety of strategies to spread the information. This paper discusses the value and issues in disseminating research findings; and encourages different strategies to share innovative findings with appropriate audiences to assist efforts for translation into practice to improve health outcomes.
Researchers have a duty of care to their participants, their profession, science, and health care, and accountability to funding bodies and the public for research funds and the dissemination of findings. If research results are not disseminated in effective ways, there is little value to the research being undertaken in the first place.
The reasons for non-dissemination or effective dissemination of results are numerous, including publishing in journals not accessible or understandable to practitioners, and not using a wide variety of strategies to spread the information. This paper discusses the value and issues in disseminating research findings; and encourages different strategies to share innovative findings with appropriate audiences to assist efforts for translation into practice to improve health outcomes.
목차
Introduction
Aim
The value of disseminating results
Issues in the process of distributing findings
Non-dissemination of findings
Strategies for dissemination of findings
Journal articles and brief research reports
Targeting consumers
Other print-based material, DVDs, audio material and videos
Podcasting
Press releases
Workshops and other group presentations
Social media
Evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice
Conclusion
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
Micro-narrative analysis
A
,
thu
,
W. F
외 1명
Journal of Qualitative Research
2001
.12
Introduction
A
,
thu
,
W. F
외 1명
Journal of Qualitative Research
2001
.12
Issue Five : Part Two - Audience : The audience for a proposal will determine its nature/shape
편집부
Journal of Qualitative Research
2010
.04
Issue Four : Part Two - Early Career Development Post Doctoral Programs
편집부
Journal of Qualitative Research
2010
.04
Issue two : Points of hesitation Qualitative research, human rights and social justice
편집부
Journal of Qualitative Research
2010
.04
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-512-000493187