지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
With the study on the border of Korean Language and Literature and it’s possible fusion with other academic genres, we are able to establish the academic vision and perspectives. In this paper, for the academic productivity, I am going to redefine the term ‘kukeo’, to scrutinize the relationship between Korean Language studies and the Korean literature and overview the academic system in the university.
Traditionally, Korean language and literature coexisted in parallel, but the sources are not same language, the scholars of linguistics deal with the ordinary language, the scholars of literature work with language of art that is the literary works. And we can find also that the methods of two area almost can not be approximated each other. In linguistics, to make a general rule of the language, and but in literature the idiosyncratic feature of the works is more important. With the clear understanding of the differences of language and literature, it will be able to cooperate each other.
For the more wide border of Korean language and literature, the academic system must be redesigned as a faculty system, faculty of ‘Korean Language and Culture’. In the renewed faculty they can study the main area Korean Kanguage, Korean Literature, Korean Language Culture including all sorts of language concerned activities. And more attempts possible to be traced the subjects: language management, general speech, language communication, language education, language ethics, sociostylistics and others.
Traditionally, Korean language and literature coexisted in parallel, but the sources are not same language, the scholars of linguistics deal with the ordinary language, the scholars of literature work with language of art that is the literary works. And we can find also that the methods of two area almost can not be approximated each other. In linguistics, to make a general rule of the language, and but in literature the idiosyncratic feature of the works is more important. With the clear understanding of the differences of language and literature, it will be able to cooperate each other.
For the more wide border of Korean language and literature, the academic system must be redesigned as a faculty system, faculty of ‘Korean Language and Culture’. In the renewed faculty they can study the main area Korean Kanguage, Korean Literature, Korean Language Culture including all sorts of language concerned activities. And more attempts possible to be traced the subjects: language management, general speech, language communication, language education, language ethics, sociostylistics and others.
목차
1. 학문적 성찰과 반성의 의미
2. ‘국어’라는 용어에 대하여
3. ‘한국어학’과 ‘한국문학’의 관계
4. 학문적 제도의 문제
5. 한국어학, 한국문학의 생산성
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-810-000685842