메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
허태용 (성균관대학교)
저널정보
호서사학회 역사와 담론 역사와 담론 第59輯
발행연도
2011.8
수록면
39 - 68 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
As we all know, Sin Chaeho, who was representative nationalistic historian in early 20th century, paid great attention to ancient korean history rather than medieval or modern korean history. This tendency was originated from his will and desire to make historical korea independent from foreign powers, because according to his view, only in ancient times korea preserve the independent, and struggled with foreign powers such as china. On the contrary, Goryeo and Joseon dynasty period was filled with dependent spirit because of buddhism and confucianism.
Anyway, it seems that Sin Chaeho did not completely deny the meaning of that period. As one of ways to establish national identity, he emphasized to preserve the national characteristics(國粹) which consist of ancestral absolute beauty in religion, language, history, customs and so on. Needless to say, core of national characteristics was seongyo(仙敎) in ancient times, but he admitted the virtue of fundamental confucianism, and buddhism simultaneously. He thought that the virtue of fundamental confucianism did not realized well in Joseon period except Jo Gwangjo, Yi Hwang, and the possibility of realization of fundamental confucianism was depend on the fact how figures deal with confucianism. In case of realization of fundamental confucianism, it could be included in the category of national characteristics.
In this context, Sin Chaeho paid attention to some distingushed figures of Joseon dynasty such as Bak Jiwon, Han Baekgyeom, Yi Ik, Jeong Yakyong who tried to reach and realize virtue of ancient confucianism by way of studying a lot of classics. This means that he regarded Joseon period as the period of preservation national characteristics, whereas he rated Joseon period in the aspect of political military ability poorly.

목차

1. 머리말
2. 신채호의 시대구분
3. 신채호가 바라보는 고려 이후 역사의 성격
4. 맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (21)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-911-000930493