지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2011.11
- 수록면
- 177 - 184 (8page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In spite of the large stiffness of the CIP wall, it is used only as the temporary wall. Because it shows the problems of straightness and the poor unification in the joint between the each pile. Recently the Uni-wall method which improves the disadvantage of the CIP has been developed, still for the temporary wall. Therefore, the Uni-wall method is utilized and Permanent Uni-wall System(PUS) tries to be developed.
In this research, the economic analysis with the current method of construction which is used like the CIP method+basement wall and slurry wall method as the underground permanent wall in order to evaluate the profitability of PUS was performed.
At this time, the structure and construction condition used in the analysis considered the arbitrary environment and With respect to this, each basement wall was designed and the output of resources and construction cost was calculated and it applied to the analysis. At this time, the construction cost classified as the material cost, labor cost, and expenses and analyze.
The material cost analyzed result, Type 1 section of PUS was required the most expensive cost and the slurry wall method was required the smallest cost. The labor cost analyzed result, slurry wall method needed the most abundant cost and PUS Type 1 section needed the smallest human resource. The expenses analyzed result, slurry wall method was required the most expensive cost and the CIP method+basement wall needed the lowest cost.
The total construction cost analyzed result, slurry wall method was required most expensive cost and PUS Type 2 section showed up as the most economic method.
In this research, the economic analysis with the current method of construction which is used like the CIP method+basement wall and slurry wall method as the underground permanent wall in order to evaluate the profitability of PUS was performed.
At this time, the structure and construction condition used in the analysis considered the arbitrary environment and With respect to this, each basement wall was designed and the output of resources and construction cost was calculated and it applied to the analysis. At this time, the construction cost classified as the material cost, labor cost, and expenses and analyze.
The material cost analyzed result, Type 1 section of PUS was required the most expensive cost and the slurry wall method was required the smallest cost. The labor cost analyzed result, slurry wall method needed the most abundant cost and PUS Type 1 section needed the smallest human resource. The expenses analyzed result, slurry wall method was required the most expensive cost and the CIP method+basement wall needed the lowest cost.
The total construction cost analyzed result, slurry wall method was required most expensive cost and PUS Type 2 section showed up as the most economic method.
목차
Abstract
1. 서론
2. 지하벽체로 사용되는 현행 공법
3. PUS공법
4. 시공환경 및 구조물 계획
5. 경제성 분석
6. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (1)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
전통한옥과 신한옥의 가진 크기에 따른 동적응답특성 평가
이슬기
,
김영민
,
노지은
외 2명
대한건축학회 논문집 - 구조계
2013
.01
건설장비의 최적 운송경로 탐색 방법론 개발
이동은
,
곽한성
,
손창백
대한건축학회 논문집 - 구조계
2012
.12
개방형 BIM 데이터 품질관리 체계화 방법에 관한 연구
권오철
,
조찬원
,
조주원
대한건축학회 논문집 - 구조계
2012
.02
공간별 분류체계와 생산성 분석 기반의 공공아파트 골조공사 공기 산정 방법 개발
지성민
,
현창택
대한건축학회 논문집 - 구조계
2012
.02
사망자 및 중환자를 유발하는 건설중대재해 요인간 연관성 분석
신동필
,
손창백
,
이동은
대한건축학회 논문집 - 구조계
2012
.02
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-540-001053689