지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Korean unification is bound up with the dual product of benefit and cost. Existing studies on unification cost, however, have so far given attention to the cost only, rather neglecting the unification benefit. This common knowledge results in negative effects on people"s perception of national unification.
It would be difficult to calculate the exact amount of the unification cost in the future. The unification cost is not a fixed one, but a changeable one depending on the manner and process of the unification. Regardless of how large the unification cost might be, the unification benefit is possibly going to increase over time whereas the unification cost might be on a downturn. It can be argued that the unification on a long-term basis will bring more benefit than cost to Koreans.
Discussions on the unification cost, therefore, critically depend on how to overcome the difficulties of Valley of transition." In fact, the unification at the early stage will saddle us with burdens to some degree, thereby leading to the excess of the unification cost overshadowing the unification benefit. It is the contention The paper contends that one of the most effective way of overcoming the difficulties of the Valley of transition" would resume economic interchanges and cooperation between the South and the North. It also emphasizes the importance of a more proper unification strategy and policy that would reduce cost but increase benefit in the future.
It would be difficult to calculate the exact amount of the unification cost in the future. The unification cost is not a fixed one, but a changeable one depending on the manner and process of the unification. Regardless of how large the unification cost might be, the unification benefit is possibly going to increase over time whereas the unification cost might be on a downturn. It can be argued that the unification on a long-term basis will bring more benefit than cost to Koreans.
Discussions on the unification cost, therefore, critically depend on how to overcome the difficulties of Valley of transition." In fact, the unification at the early stage will saddle us with burdens to some degree, thereby leading to the excess of the unification cost overshadowing the unification benefit. It is the contention The paper contends that one of the most effective way of overcoming the difficulties of the Valley of transition" would resume economic interchanges and cooperation between the South and the North. It also emphasizes the importance of a more proper unification strategy and policy that would reduce cost but increase benefit in the future.
목차
서론: ‘발상의 전환‘을 위하여
1. 통일비용의 개념과 기존 논의에 대한 비판적 고찰
2. 통일비용 논의에 대한 발상의 전환
3. ‘전환의 계곡‘ 효과와 미래 지향적 통일
결론: 공존·공영의 가치로부터
주
참고문헌 (3)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-905-001129521