지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2010.12
- 수록면
- 215 - 278 (64page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Reform discussions surrounding Korean legal protection regime for the mentally incapacitated adult and which started nearly a decade ago have eventually resulted in the government draft bill in December 2009, which has since been under legislative scrutiny. Taking account of the experience of other advanced countries who have recently revised their legal framework for the protection of the mentally incapacitated adult, the suggested government draft seems short of the realization of such adults’ human right as well as proper protection for them. For the purpose of putting the academic discussion and practical attention on the right way to such goals as non-discrimination and normalization of such adults, this paper introduces the historical development in English law for the legal protection of the mentally incapacitated adult and the features of the Mental Capacity Act 2005, which fully came into force as of October 2007.
This paper sketches such historical development as a tedious way so as to normalize the mentally incapacitated adult to the extent that they are entitled to the same treatment as the other citizen within the community, rather than being insulated from the community. From the legal perspective, it is, this paper argues, important that the mental capacity to make a decision on a specific subject matter should be determined on a case by case basis, rather than being approached on an all-or-nothing basis; even though the latter tends to be beautifully painted on the pretext of protecting them, it would result in discrimination and even humiliation of the mentally incapacitated adult. England’s experience, even though it holds true for the UK as a whole, shows that a functional approach toward the mental capacity issue itself cannot provoke any legal problem at all; in other words, common law sufficiently enables could-be pitfalls to be filled, such that the mentally incapacitated adult cannot be discriminated against, what this paper seeks to prove.
What is more important to learn something from England’s experience is that there are many players who support the mentally incapacitated adult, whose roles are institutionalized by way of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Among such supportive players acting based on the 2005, the Court of Protection and the Public Guardian can contribute to the protection of such adults, with aid from the Office of the Public Guardian and the Court of Protection Visitors. This paper suggests that in order to realize enhanced protection of the mentally incapacitated adult, Korean legislators learn from England’s experience in that the appropriate players to do protective and supervisory function with legal power to sanction abuses and neglects of the mentally incapacitated adult and with responsibility to propose further legal and systematic reform for the purpose of such adults’ proper protection are to be institutionalized, which is no less crucial in Korean legal environment than the introduction of a functional approach toward the mental capacity.
This paper sketches such historical development as a tedious way so as to normalize the mentally incapacitated adult to the extent that they are entitled to the same treatment as the other citizen within the community, rather than being insulated from the community. From the legal perspective, it is, this paper argues, important that the mental capacity to make a decision on a specific subject matter should be determined on a case by case basis, rather than being approached on an all-or-nothing basis; even though the latter tends to be beautifully painted on the pretext of protecting them, it would result in discrimination and even humiliation of the mentally incapacitated adult. England’s experience, even though it holds true for the UK as a whole, shows that a functional approach toward the mental capacity issue itself cannot provoke any legal problem at all; in other words, common law sufficiently enables could-be pitfalls to be filled, such that the mentally incapacitated adult cannot be discriminated against, what this paper seeks to prove.
What is more important to learn something from England’s experience is that there are many players who support the mentally incapacitated adult, whose roles are institutionalized by way of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Among such supportive players acting based on the 2005, the Court of Protection and the Public Guardian can contribute to the protection of such adults, with aid from the Office of the Public Guardian and the Court of Protection Visitors. This paper suggests that in order to realize enhanced protection of the mentally incapacitated adult, Korean legislators learn from England’s experience in that the appropriate players to do protective and supervisory function with legal power to sanction abuses and neglects of the mentally incapacitated adult and with responsibility to propose further legal and systematic reform for the purpose of such adults’ proper protection are to be institutionalized, which is no less crucial in Korean legal environment than the introduction of a functional approach toward the mental capacity.
목차
Ⅰ. 서설
Ⅱ. 역사적 전개과정
Ⅲ. 정신능력법 하에서의 의사결정능력상의 문제가 있는 성인의 보호제도의 특징
Ⅳ. MCA에 기초한 활동주체 및 본인을 위한 보호 및 감독기능
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (43)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - 김봉철 / 2009 / 영국의 성년후견제도 관련규범, 맞춤형 법제정보 / 법제연구원
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김천수 / 2007 / 成年後見과 醫療行爲의 決定 / 가족법연구 21 (1) : 1 ~ 30
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김형석 / 2010 / 민법 개정안에 따른 성년후견법제 / 가족법연구 24 (2) : 111 ~ 166
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 박인환 / 2010 / 새로운 성년후견제 도입을 위한 민법개정안의 검토 / 가족법연구 24 (1) : 31 ~ 74
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 백승흠 / 2000 / 성년후견제도의 입법방향 / 민사법학 (18)
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김천수 / 2007 / 成年後見과 醫療行爲의 決定 / 가족법연구 21 (1) : 1 ~ 30
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김형석 / 2010 / 민법 개정안에 따른 성년후견법제 / 가족법연구 24 (2) : 111 ~ 166
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 박인환 / 2010 / 새로운 성년후견제 도입을 위한 민법개정안의 검토 / 가족법연구 24 (1) : 31 ~ 74
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 백승흠 / 2000 / 성년후견제도의 입법방향 / 민사법학 (18)
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
취약계층을 위한 성년후견제도의 개선방향
한양법학
2015 .02
-
A Study on the Independent Living Abilities of the Mentally Disabled Adult
한국무역학회 국제학술대회
2017 .07
-
신상결정 대행에 있어 싱가포르 정신능력법의 시사점
법학논집
2014 .01
-
A Comparative Study on Life Satisfaction among Urban General Older Adults, Older Adults of Livelihood Protection Benefits, Rural General Older Adults
International Journal of Gerontological Social Welfare
1999 .09
-
정신장애인 당사자운동에 참여한 정신건강사회복지사의 경험에 관한 연구
복지상담교육연구
2020 .01
-
마포구 정신장애인 사망사건을 통해본 정신보건법제의 개선방안
법과 정책연구
2016 .01
-
일 지역 경영자들의 정신장애인 직업재활에 관한 인식 및 요구도 조사
정신간호학회지
2008 .01
-
의료행위와 대리승낙
의료법학
2014 .01
-
성년후견과 의료 -개정 민법 제947조의 2를 중심으로-
의료법학
2012 .01
-
정신장애 범죄인의 처우에 관한 연구
법학연구
2007 .02
-
프랑스법상 성년자보호제도와 자율지원의 원칙
法學論文集
2012 .01
-
정신질환과 노동 : 법적 쟁점을 중심으로
노동법연구
2012 .03
-
Analysis on Mental and Physical Change of the Mentally Disabled Elderly through Physical Activities Program
International Journal of Gerontological Social Welfare
2010 .06
-
정신장애범죄자에 대한 치료처분제도의 개선방안: 미국의 치료법원의 도입을 중심으로
형사법연구
2010 .01
-
한국 법무부의 성년후견제도에 관한 민법개정안
재산법연구
2010 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
상가건물 임대차에서의 권리금 보호에 관한 연구
이봉림
공공사회연구
2015
.02
물권의 객체로서의 물건 : 민법해석 방법에 대한 약간의 문제제기를 겸하여
제철웅
중앙법학
2000
.08
[민법] 공유토지 위의 단독소유건물 · 공유건물과 법정지상권 : 일부 토지공유자의 소유지분이 처분 또는 경매된 경우의 법리를 중심으로 (대상판례 : 대법원 2014. 9. 4. 선고 2011다73038, 73045 판결)
김제완
고시계
2015
.06
토지와 건물의 관계에 관한 기초연구(18-完)
김성수
사법행정
2014
.06
토지와 건물의 관계에 관한 기초연구(17) : 자료 2 : 三好登의 土地, 建物間の法的構成(2002년)을 중심으로
김성수
사법행정
2014
.05
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-001270619