지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2009.6
- 수록면
- 493 - 529 (37page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In the past history of Japan and Korea, holding companies were restrained or strictly allowed. There is almost no precedent where law has wholly forbid the holding companies like Korea. After Japan has turned its way into restrictively allowing holding companies, there were criticisms that there is no system which prohibits entire systems of holding companies.
There are many areas where the shift of paradigm are demanded or is currently happening since the IMF economy crisis. Today, holding companies are rather recommended due to many factors, especially to promote transparency in corporate governance to attract the foreign investors. Holding companies are recommended which were restrained or tabooed in the past. This is somewhat ironical.
Korean law system divides financial holding companies and normal holding companies, accordingly to ‘separation of financial and industrial capital’ principle. By dividing mutual business department, it restricts acquirement of stocks. As a part of financial holding companies, insurance holding companies are also regulated at the same time, and the fact that foreign law systems fractionizes the financial holding companies and strengthen and loosen the strictness of regulations, there is a debate whether unnecessary regulations are applied. This paper will overlook the regulations of insurance holding companies in Japan insurance law, and find the positive points that can be applied to Korea. However there are differences in social environment between Korea and Japan, thus two countriesshould not be treated the same. It is a known fact that insurance companies are playing a great role in order to not to conflict the problem between chaebeols’ concentration of economy with the restrictions on holding companies. On the other hand, in Japan, insurance companies are in no relations with the core of the problem of economy concentrations. For that reason, the proposition ‘just because Japan apply soft regulations to insurance holding companies, differently to financial holding companies, that Korea should separate insurance holding companies from financial holding companies and apply soft regulations’, is a misunderstanding of the core of the discussion.
There are many areas where the shift of paradigm are demanded or is currently happening since the IMF economy crisis. Today, holding companies are rather recommended due to many factors, especially to promote transparency in corporate governance to attract the foreign investors. Holding companies are recommended which were restrained or tabooed in the past. This is somewhat ironical.
Korean law system divides financial holding companies and normal holding companies, accordingly to ‘separation of financial and industrial capital’ principle. By dividing mutual business department, it restricts acquirement of stocks. As a part of financial holding companies, insurance holding companies are also regulated at the same time, and the fact that foreign law systems fractionizes the financial holding companies and strengthen and loosen the strictness of regulations, there is a debate whether unnecessary regulations are applied. This paper will overlook the regulations of insurance holding companies in Japan insurance law, and find the positive points that can be applied to Korea. However there are differences in social environment between Korea and Japan, thus two countriesshould not be treated the same. It is a known fact that insurance companies are playing a great role in order to not to conflict the problem between chaebeols’ concentration of economy with the restrictions on holding companies. On the other hand, in Japan, insurance companies are in no relations with the core of the problem of economy concentrations. For that reason, the proposition ‘just because Japan apply soft regulations to insurance holding companies, differently to financial holding companies, that Korea should separate insurance holding companies from financial holding companies and apply soft regulations’, is a misunderstanding of the core of the discussion.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 지주회사와 금산분리
Ⅲ. 일본 보험업법상 보험지주회사
Ⅳ. 한국의 보험지주회사론 및 시사점
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (21)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김상조 / 2006 / 미국 보험지주회사제도에서의 금융자본과 산업자본의 분리 원칙-보험지주회사법상의 자산운용규제를 중심으로 / 사회경제평론 (26) : 7 ~ 37
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김선정 / 2008 / 금융지주회사와 보험지주회사 규율방식의 분리에 관한 검토 / 경영법률 19 (1) : 37 ~ 74
3. [단행본] - 권오승 / 2005 / 경제법(제5판) / 법문사
4. [단행본] - 권재열 / 2005 / 경제법(4정판) / 법원사
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 백정웅 / 2008 / 우리나라 금융지주회사법의 규제법리에 관한 비교법적 연구 / 상사법연구 26 (4) : 361 ~ 407
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김선정 / 2008 / 금융지주회사와 보험지주회사 규율방식의 분리에 관한 검토 / 경영법률 19 (1) : 37 ~ 74
3. [단행본] - 권오승 / 2005 / 경제법(제5판) / 법문사
4. [단행본] - 권재열 / 2005 / 경제법(4정판) / 법원사
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 백정웅 / 2008 / 우리나라 금융지주회사법의 규제법리에 관한 비교법적 연구 / 상사법연구 26 (4) : 361 ~ 407
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
보험지주회사 규제에 관한 소고
중앙법학
2009 .04
-
일본의 금융지주회사제도의 현황
기업법연구
2010 .03
-
보험지주회사 도입논의를 위한 미국법제 연구
기업법연구
2009 .06
-
持株會社의 經營支配構造에 관한 改善方案
기업법연구
2013 .12
-
대규모기업집단과 지주회사
지역사회연구
2011 .03
-
금융지주회사제도의 문제점과 개선방안
기업법연구
2013 .03
-
공정거래법상 지주회사의 주요 추세와 특징-신설․존속 지주회사, 계열회사, 지주비율, 자산총액을 중심으로-
기업경영연구
2011 .01
-
한국 금융지주회사법상 비은행지주회사에 대한 비교법적 연구 : 미국법제를 중심으로
비교사법
2011 .06
-
공정거래법상 지주회사 규제의 문제점과 개선방안
고려법학
2008 .01
-
현행의 금융지주회사제도에 관한 소고
기업법연구
2004 .03
-
금융지주회사 설립전후 투자자 반응
대한경영학회지
2010 .02
-
지주회사 규제에 대한 재검토
경영법률
2007 .01
-
기술지주회사의 도입과 과세문제
법과 정책연구
2009 .01
-
금융지주회사와 기업지배구조에 관한 법적 고찰
비교사법
2010 .06
-
현행 지주회사 과세체계의 문제점 및 개선방안
조세학술논집
2006 .02
-
持株會社의 株主保護方案
기업법연구
2003 .09
-
롯데그룹 지주회사체제의 성립 과정과 의의
경영사연구
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-001271590