메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이상명 (순천향대학교)
저널정보
한양법학회 한양법학 한양법학 제36집
발행연도
2011.11
수록면
319 - 353 (35page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
An anti-communism ideology occurred a korean war later was an important opportunity and became a ground of a justification for the state to collect and utilize national personal information, collected personal information and resident control by it became an important prop in maintenance and reinforcement for an authority of Park Jung Heuy political power again. By the way, the government didn"t liquidate these problems completely In front of a timex subject which is the information-oriented society in after 1990"s and overrided an administration convenience than a private life protection. It brought national control reinforcement and invasion problem of basic human rights by propelling administration computer network project, resident registration computer network project, electronic ID card project. To served that needs, this theses evaluated in a constitutional sight on fingerprinting of resident registration system.
The case of the state registrate ten fingerprints of all the citizens compulsorily is almost unique in Korea. In foreign case, public peace agencies such as police utilize fingerprint information for concrete criminal investigation or identification. but in Korea, when the state issue ID card to all the citizens over 17-year-old it collect their fingerprint information regardless of their will. Resident registration system allows the Chief of National Police to take custody, computerize and use the fingerprint forms. As for this, possibility of privacy right invasion is high.
The fingerprinting is unconstitutional by legal basis principle, rule clearness principle, purpose restriction principle, excess prevent principle. Namely a fingerprinting infringe personal rights, innocence deduction principle, warrant principle, and the right of self-determination of information.

목차

I. 문제의 제기
II. 정보사회와 지문날인제도
III. 지문날인제도의 위헌성
IV. 지문날인제도의 개선방안
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (40)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-001499121