메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김성중 (동국대학교)
저널정보
신영어영문학회 신영어영문학 신영어영문학 제51집
발행연도
2012.2
수록면
1 - 21 (21page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Two Different Deaths in Sardanapalus and The Two Foscari. The New Studies of English Language & Literature 51 (2012): 1-21. Byron’s Sardapanalus and The Two Foscari have posed a controversial question of whether they are political or historical, and recent critics tend to regard them as political dramas. However, if we treat them as counterpart dramas, the controversy becomes clear. This paper argues that they should be read as historical dramas dealing with universal subjects rather than contemporary political issues. Despite the fact that they are both tragedies ending with tragic deaths of each protagonist, Byron seems to show how different they are in respect of individual efforts against tyranny: the king dies as a hero rebelling against the tyrannical demand that he must expand his realms killing innocent people whereas the doge dies as a helpless victim manipulated into obeying tyrannical laws of Venice, which killed his own son. Byron is a poet well-known for his being rebellious against any kind of tyranny. Some critics depreciate his dramas as ‘undramatic’ but if we note that Byron intended his dramas, not for the audiences in theater but for the readers, these dramas are successful in delivering his message clearly. (Dongguk University)

목차

인용문헌

참고문헌 (23)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-840-001519441