지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Samguk-Yusa is one of the most important books on the ancient history of Korea. It bears some historical records derived from various inscriptions. They were originally incised in monks" monuments, Buddhist statues and bronze bells. Il-yeon(一然), the author of Samguk-Yusa cited them very deliberately. So we can trace some characteristics of the historical records in Samguk-Yusa by comparing its texts with the original inscriptions.
In this paper, I chose two inscriptions as the samples and tried to analyze how and how much they were cited in Samguk-Yusa. The two samples are a stone statue of Maitreya(彌勒) and one of Amitabha(阿彌 陀), both of which were displayed at Gamsan-sa Temple in Gyeongju. Il-yeon cut off much potion from the original inscriptions and made us slightly misunderstand the contents. But the main ideas on the inscriptions are delivered so well that we can rely on the texts of Samguk-Yusa as a whole.
And in the course of survey, I found an interesting thing. It is that Samguk-Yusa does not tell any story on the Zen Buddhism(禪宗) and its monks. It is very curious in that lots of monuments for Zen monks existed at the time of writing Samguk-Yusa. And furthermore Il-yeon himself was a Zen monk. There have been some opinions towards searching for an adequate answer on the question. They have some reasoning power but defects as well. I suggested a new idea that Il-yeon looked down on his predecessors who had shown an unfriendly attitude towards the non-Zen Buddhism. It was the very reason that he did not deal with a history of the Zen Buddhism and its monks in his own history book, Samguk-Yusa.
In this paper, I chose two inscriptions as the samples and tried to analyze how and how much they were cited in Samguk-Yusa. The two samples are a stone statue of Maitreya(彌勒) and one of Amitabha(阿彌 陀), both of which were displayed at Gamsan-sa Temple in Gyeongju. Il-yeon cut off much potion from the original inscriptions and made us slightly misunderstand the contents. But the main ideas on the inscriptions are delivered so well that we can rely on the texts of Samguk-Yusa as a whole.
And in the course of survey, I found an interesting thing. It is that Samguk-Yusa does not tell any story on the Zen Buddhism(禪宗) and its monks. It is very curious in that lots of monuments for Zen monks existed at the time of writing Samguk-Yusa. And furthermore Il-yeon himself was a Zen monk. There have been some opinions towards searching for an adequate answer on the question. They have some reasoning power but defects as well. I suggested a new idea that Il-yeon looked down on his predecessors who had shown an unfriendly attitude towards the non-Zen Buddhism. It was the very reason that he did not deal with a history of the Zen Buddhism and its monks in his own history book, Samguk-Yusa.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 『삼국유사』의 금석문 자료 활용에서 보이는 특징
3. 저술에 이용된 금석문 자료와 『삼국유사』에서의 선종 관련 서술
4. 현존 금석문 자료와의 대조를 통해 본 『삼국유사』 수록 사료의 성격
5. 맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-911-001578599