메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
최지현 (한국해양수산개발원)
저널정보
한국해양수산개발원 해양정책연구 해양정책연구 제26권 제1호
발행연도
2011.6
수록면
69 - 99 (31page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article studies the provisional measure of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea(hereafter ‘ITLOS’) comparing with that of the International Court of Justice(hereafter ‘ICJ’). It has been already known that the provisional measure of the ITLOS follows the provisional measure of ICJ’s case law, so to speak, prima facie jurisdiction, contents, procedures and effects. But the provision of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea(hereafter ‘Law of the Sea’) makes some differences of the provisional measure of the ITLOS from the ICJ’s in its system and its operation. The provisional measure of the ITLOS has next three characteristics. First, the ITLOS can order provisional measure in order not only to preserve the right of the parties of a suit but also to protect the marine environment. Secondly, the ITLOS’s case law has been conforming the different shape of the provisional measure according to the Law of the Sea, which has it’s own dispute settlement mechanism. Thirdly, the ITLOS has the capacity of developing the provisional measure by complimenting the weak point of it. But we must bear it mind that when innovating the provisional measure, harming to the elementary framework of the provisional measure formed by the ICJ with long lasting accumulation of the practice and case law should be avoided.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서언
Ⅱ. 제도의 개요
Ⅲ. 제도상 차이점
Ⅳ. 운영상 차이점
Ⅴ. 결어
참고문헌

참고문헌 (43)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-454-001646687