지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Earlier research on the Oda regime focused mainly on the determination of the latter’s nature: whether the regime constituted early modern or medieval power. In recent years, certain studies have seen the relationship between the Oda regime and the Emperor not as one of confrontation but as one of cooperation. However, research perspectives that concentrate on whether the Oda regime was early modern or medieval or whether it confronted or cooperated with the Emperor are but dichotomous perspectives that merely stress only one aspect of the regime.
According to the generally accepted perspective of Naohiro Asao and others, the key to the Oda regime lay in “military power” (bui : 武威), which could be expanded to deify those including Nobunaga. The present study focused on the term “honorable power” (goik? : 御威光), found in historical materials, as in “Nobunaga’s honorable power” and on the relationship between “military power” and “honorable power.” According to the generally accepted perspective, goik? has been understood as identical in meaning to bui. In the present study, however, “honorable power” was understood as a concept encompassing not only “military power” but also virtues such as “mercy” (jihishin : 慈悲心). Consequently, unlike existing research, it wasn’t seen the expansion of military power as directly leading to deification. As in the passage “Nobunaga is one who is well versed in the ways of both arms and virtue” (信長公御武德兩道御達者), deification became possible only when military power was combined with virtue such as mercy.
The present study examined the aspect that compelled the relationship between Nobunaga and the Emperor to be confrontational yet cooperative at once. While, according to Asao, Nobunaga “transcended” and “overcame” the Emperor’s authority, there is no clear proof that he in fact denied the latter’s authority. On the contrary, Nobunaga made use of the god?like (Shinto) and Buddha?like elements of the Emperor to control the populace and warriors and did not deny the Emperor’s rights. However, as far as Nobunaga was concerned, the goal lay in his own “honorable power,” and the protection of the Emperor’s rights was neither his final target nor destination.
According to the generally accepted perspective of Naohiro Asao and others, the key to the Oda regime lay in “military power” (bui : 武威), which could be expanded to deify those including Nobunaga. The present study focused on the term “honorable power” (goik? : 御威光), found in historical materials, as in “Nobunaga’s honorable power” and on the relationship between “military power” and “honorable power.” According to the generally accepted perspective, goik? has been understood as identical in meaning to bui. In the present study, however, “honorable power” was understood as a concept encompassing not only “military power” but also virtues such as “mercy” (jihishin : 慈悲心). Consequently, unlike existing research, it wasn’t seen the expansion of military power as directly leading to deification. As in the passage “Nobunaga is one who is well versed in the ways of both arms and virtue” (信長公御武德兩道御達者), deification became possible only when military power was combined with virtue such as mercy.
The present study examined the aspect that compelled the relationship between Nobunaga and the Emperor to be confrontational yet cooperative at once. While, according to Asao, Nobunaga “transcended” and “overcame” the Emperor’s authority, there is no clear proof that he in fact denied the latter’s authority. On the contrary, Nobunaga made use of the god?like (Shinto) and Buddha?like elements of the Emperor to control the populace and warriors and did not deny the Emperor’s rights. However, as far as Nobunaga was concerned, the goal lay in his own “honorable power,” and the protection of the Emperor’s rights was neither his final target nor destination.
목차
1. 머리말
2. ‘武家神格化’와 ‘御威光’의 의미
3. 織田정권의 천황 인식과 祭祀權
4. 맺음말
참고문헌 (66)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-374-001707580