메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이성근 (영남대학교) 심상운 (한국토지주택공사) 이관률 (충남발전연구원)
저널정보
한국도시행정학회 도시행정학보 도시행정학보 제25집 제1호
발행연도
2012.3
수록면
65 - 84 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to analyze the residential satisfaction of National Rental Housing Residents by the type of region. To do this, this study categorizes 4 types of the region into the central area in capital region, the suburban area in capital region, the central area in non-capital region and the suburban area in non-capital region. In this study, we use the Residential Satisfaction research data by Korea Land & Housing Corporation. The contents of this research are as follows.
First, according to the result through the causal analyses which were performed employing 31 specific variables selected, this research identified 5 determinants of the residential satisfaction, which is considered right to set the internal structure, the quality of the interior material, supporting facilities of the complex, local amenities and the housing expenses.
Second, the degree of the residential satisfaction in the national rental housing was somewhat higher, showing the degree of 5.47. Examined by the type of region, the degree of satisfaction scored respectively 5.73 and 5.64 in the central area and suburban area in non-capital region, in suburban area and central area in capital region followed 5.33 and 4.98 (F=15.28, prob=0.0001)
Third, the decision factor of the residential satisfaction on the national rental housing revealed that the level of satisfaction was relatively high in supporting facilities of the complex, the internal structure and the quality of the interior material, but was relatively low in other factors. In type of region, there are no difference between the internal structure (F=0.23, prob=0.8756) and the quality of the interior material (F=1.13, prob=0.3361), however, supporting facilities of the complex (F=3.44, prob=0.0165), local amenities (F=6.19, prob=0.0004) and the housing expenses (F=8.33, prob=0.0001) showed disparities by the type of region.
Fourth, according to the analysis of Residential Satisfaction of National Rental Housing Residents by the type of region, it is certain that the determinants of the residential satisfaction were different in regional characteristics. Above all, in <model 1>, statistically, all 5 factors gave meaningful influence on the residential satisfaction. And in <model 2>, the determinants of the residential satisfaction showed disparity in regions. For example, in the central area in capital region, local amenities acted as only crucial factor, and in the suburban area in capital region, local amenities, supporting facilities, the quality of the interior material affected the determinants in satisfaction. The main factors in non-capital region, supporting facilities, the internal structure and the housing expenses played important roles in central area, however, all 5 determinants gave statistically significant influence on satisfaction in suburban area.

목차

ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 논의
Ⅲ. 연구설계
Ⅳ. 분석결과의 논의
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (24)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0