지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2012.5
- 수록면
- 287 - 316 (30page)
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Public interest in lotteries has been increasing over recent years, as evidenced by the growth in ticket sales and in the number of lottery funds. Previously, scholars paid very little attention to lottery policy but recently it has become one of the major major policy issues for everybody in the Government. In order to address the issue of quantitative growth accompanied by qualitative shortcomings which lotteries face, this study has analyzed the agenda setting processes of lottery policy based on historical facts. A particular focus was the definition of agenda setting as the first step in the policy process by the lead group, as well as public interest in the agenda setting process.
The results of the case study reveal that there are four types of agenda setting processes in Korean lottery policy; mobilization of the housing lottery, inside-access of the sports lottery, outside-initiation of the online lottery, and consolidation of the union lottery. Changes were made simultaneously in the type of agenda-setting process, the control system, and regulation of the lottery market. In the agenda-setting process, the lead group has been affected by the political environment, and public interest has been influenced by the results of the previous lottery policy The most important step toward choosing an alternative lottery policy is the agenda setting stage. Since the agenda has been built, there have been hardly no changes and the agenda has been reflected in the formulation of lottery policy. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that the value of ‘justice’ and the procedural standard of ‘consolidation’ are necessary in order to set the goal of the lottery policy agenda.
The results of the case study reveal that there are four types of agenda setting processes in Korean lottery policy; mobilization of the housing lottery, inside-access of the sports lottery, outside-initiation of the online lottery, and consolidation of the union lottery. Changes were made simultaneously in the type of agenda-setting process, the control system, and regulation of the lottery market. In the agenda-setting process, the lead group has been affected by the political environment, and public interest has been influenced by the results of the previous lottery policy The most important step toward choosing an alternative lottery policy is the agenda setting stage. Since the agenda has been built, there have been hardly no changes and the agenda has been reflected in the formulation of lottery policy. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that the value of ‘justice’ and the procedural standard of ‘consolidation’ are necessary in order to set the goal of the lottery policy agenda.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 및 선행연구 검토
Ⅲ. 분석틀과 연구방법
Ⅳ. 분석틀에 의한 사례분석
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (110)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
한국행정의 주민참여 정책과정 연구 : 참여의 정도와 내용을 중심으로
정정화
,
은재호
,
남재걸
한국사회와 행정연구
2014
.02
지방자치단체의 민간위탁 영향요인에 관한 실증분석 : PLS 회귀분석의 활용
추병주
,
정윤수
지방정부연구
2012
.08
소셜 미디어의 확산과 정책 거버넌스의 변동
강성남
한국사회와 행정연구
2014
.02
기초노령연금정책의 의제설정과 정책결정에 관한 인지지도분석 : MSF를 중심으로
이지호
한국정책과학학회보
2012
.03
정책수단의 정치적 성격 : 사회정책을 중심으로
권혁주
한국행정논집
2009
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0