메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
강세훈 (서울SKY병원)
저널정보
대한외과학회 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research 대한외과학회지 Vol.80 No.3
발행연도
2011.3
수록면
221 - 225 (5page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: This study was done to determine the suitable level of energy for the elimination of saphenous veins.
Methods: A randomized comparative study was done to determine the optimal linear endovenous energy density (LEED) for EVLT of incompetent great saphenous veins. Between October 2009 and September 2010, in 268 (173 women, 95 men) patients with a mean age of 43.1 (range 20∼80) were treated, using a 1,470 ㎚ diode laser at 10 watts in continuous mode. Patients were randomized to undergo EVLT with 100 J/cm (Group A) or 80 J/㎝ (Group B), respectively. They were evaluated clinically and by duplex at 1, 3, and 6 months and 1 year.
Results: There was no significant difference concerning gender, age, C of CEAP or diameter of the treated veins. Successful occlusion rates of the GSV, defined as the absence of flow on color doppler imaging, were 92% in Group A and 91% in Group B. There was no deep vein thrombosis, superficial burns or thrombophlebitis. In group A, visual analog scale was 3.7.6, which was higher than group B (2.3.2). The area of ecchymosis was 37.5% in group A, but 12.5% in group B.
Conclusion: There was no significant difference between 80 J/㎝ group and 100 J/㎝ group in terms of occlusion rate within 1 year. Long-term results will be required to determine the optimal level of energy.

목차

서론
방법
결과
고찰
결론
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (9)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0