메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김근영 (원광대학교) 김승호 (원광대학교) 변승재 (원광대학교) 권정남 (산본병원) 소병준 (원광대학교)
저널정보
대한외과학회 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research 대한외과학회지 Vol.74 No.3
발행연도
2008.3
수록면
212 - 216 (5page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: Prompt operative management of patients with peripheral artery embolism remains the treatment of choice for this malady. The clinical status of the limb, rather than the elapsed time from the onset of occlusion, was recently determined to be the best predictor of limb salvage. We investigated the clinical features, therapeutic modalities and treatment results of popliteal artery embolism compared with that of ilio-femoral artery embolism.
Methods: A retrospective review was carried out for 21 cases that were treated for lower extremity arterial embolism, from March 2000 to June 2006. The patients were classified into two groups; Group A (ilio-femoral artery embolism, n=11) and Group B (popliteal artery embolism, n=10). We analyzed the interval time from the onset of symptoms to starting treatment (the interval time), the degree of limb ischemia, the therapeutic modalities and the treatment results.
Results: The average interval time was 16.2±16.9 hours in the total 21 cases; the average interval time for Group A was 7.7±2.9 hours and that for Group B was 25.5±20.9 hours (P<0.05), and the incidence of severe limb ischemia (class IIb according to the SVS/ISCVS reporting standard) was 72.7% vs 20.0%, respectively (P<0.05). For the therapeutic modalities, surgical thromboembolectomy was performed in all cases of Group A and for 3 cases of Group B. Seven cases of Group B received radiologic intervention (3 cases percutaneous aspiration embolectomy only, and 4 cases of additional thrombolytic therapy).
Conclusion: This study shows that the interval time for popliteal artery embolism is longer than that for ilio-femoral artery embolism. In other words, it is suggested that the symptomatic progression of popliteal artery embolism is slower than that of ilio-femoral artery embolism. Therefore, we can have more chances for variable therapeutic options such as surgical thromboembolectomy, percutaneous aspiration embolectomy and/or thrombolytic therapy in patients suffering with popliteal artery embolism.

목차

서론
방법
결과
고찰
결론
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-514-002693505