메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
유문원 (서울대학교) 이인규 (서울대학교) 안혜성 (서울대학교) 김종원 (서울대학교) 이혁준 (서울대학교) 이건욱 (서울대학교) 양한광 (서울대학교)
저널정보
대한외과학회 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research 대한외과학회지 Vol.74 No.1
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
1 - 9 (9page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: This study was aimed to evaluate the current status and problems of surgical residency training program in Korea and to compare ‘ward system’(WS) with ‘team system’(TS). In WS, residents assigned to a ward take care of the patients in their ward regardless of diseases or specific staffs. In TS, residents assigned to a team or a specific staff treat the patients with specific diseases.
Methods: A questionnaire on residency training program was sent to 637 surgical residents working in 69 surgical training hospitals in September 2005. Twenty questions about education, patients’ care, and training system were included in the questionnaire and analyzed according to the training systems.
Results: The response rate was 18%(113/637). Nineteen residents work in WS, 83 in TS and 11 in other system. Mean education time per week and mean operative time per weekday were longer in WS. The continuity of patients’ care was better in TS. The responders chose their own training system as the better one.
Conclusion: WS residents considered the advantages of WS as comprehensive training and residents’ autonomy and TS residents regarded that of TS as consistent, specialized and intensive training for specific diseases. The results of this study can be used to improve and develop residency training program in surgery.

목차

서론
방법
결과
고찰
결론
REFERENCES
〈부록〉

참고문헌 (7)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0