메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이형규 (한양대학교)
저널정보
한양법학회 한양법학 한양법학 제37집
발행연도
2012.2
수록면
341 - 371 (31page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In Korea, confirming the identity of persons or adult identity verification on a visiting website or E-commerce activity on the internet is processed by asking users to become registered on it. There are several tools to confirm the identity of an individual on the internet such as Resident registration number, i-Pin, Public Verification Certificate, Cell phone certificate and Credit card certificate etc. Among them, Resident registration number is mostly common used and bound to be easily drained or stolen while in the process of storage or forwarding due to the internet characteristic of open-end network. Indeed, it happens often that draining or stealing of Resident registration number on the internet since it has been commercialized. By the way, Resident registration number includes important and sensitive personal information such as date of birth, gender and place of birth. Also, Resident registration number could be used as a medium of collecting personal information very easily. Thus, draining or misusing of Resident registration number may cause invasion of privacy and mental as well as economic damages against individuals. More serious effect is expected due to the limitation and weakness of Korean Resident registration number that is impossible to be discarded or changed when it’s drained or stolen. Because the confirming the identity on the internet is processed with correspondence of Resident registration number and name, there are many cases of steal and misuse of other’s Resident registration number in Korea. In this situation confirming the identity by Resident registration number is not effective and need reformation. In other major countries different from in Korea, individual can be a registered user and use the service without confirmation process using personal identification number for the E-commerce or entertainment website. People just need to enter their name and e-mail address, and basic payment information when it’s charging service. For instance, name and e-mail address are only necessary when someone wants to be a registered user of international internet shopping mall like eBay or Amazon. Thus, to prevent damages and diminish any harm from stealing or misuse of Resident registration number, we need to consider limit and prohibit confirmation of the identity with Resident registration number. Internet service providers should use other tools when it is necessary to confirm the identity of an individual for operating their services. Confirming the identity using Resident registration number should be permitted only when it’s regulated under the law. In addition, it is desirable to revise the law in order to promote use of other tools of confirming the identity of individual and regulate minimum inevitable use of the Resident registration number.

목차

Ⅰ. 서설
Ⅱ. 주민등록번호에 의한 본인확인의 현황과 문제점
Ⅲ. 인터넷상 주민등록번호에 의한 본인확인의 실효성
Ⅳ. 주요 외국의 개인식별번호 제도와 그 사용제한
Ⅴ. 인터넷상 주민등록번호에 의한 본인확인 가능 법규정
Ⅵ. 인터넷상 주민등록번호의 대체수단의 도입과 법제화
Ⅶ. 결어
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (19)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-002628159