메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이태정 (경희대학교) 김기동 (경희대학교) 정원식 (경희대학교) 김동술 (경희대학교)
저널정보
한국대기환경학회 한국대기환경학회지(국문) 한국대기환경학회지 제28권 제4호
발행연도
2012.8
수록면
454 - 465 (12page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The Korean government decided to reduce 30% of GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions BAU in 2020. Since many efforts to reduce emissions are urgently needed in Korea, the central administrative organization urges local governments to establish their own reduction schemes. Among many GHG emission categories, the emission from mobile source in Gyeonggi Province accounted for 25.3% of total emissions in 2007 and further the emission from road transport sector occupied the most dominant portion in this transportation category. The objective of this study was to compare 3 types of GHG emissions from road transport sector in 31 local cities/counties of Gyeonggi Province, which have been estimated by Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3 methodologies. As results, the GHG emission rates by the Tier 1 and Tier 2 were 19,991 kt-CO₂ Eq/yr and 18,511 kt-CO₂ Eq/yr, respectively. On the other hand, the emission rate by Tier 3 excluding a branch road emission portion was 18,051 kt-CO₂ Eq/yr. In addition, the total emission rate including all the main and branch road portions in Gyeonggi Province was 24,152 kt-CO₂ Eq/yr, which was estimated by a new Tier 3 methodology. Based on this study, we could conclude that Tier 3 is a reasonable methodology than Tier 1 or Tier 2. However, more accurate and less uncertain methodology must be developed by expanding traffic survey areas and adopting a suitable model for traffic volumes.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 연구방법
3. 결과 및 고찰
4. 결론
감사의 글
참고문헌

참고문헌 (2)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-539-003395841