메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
송인홍 (서울대학교) 김익재 (한국환경정책·평가연구원)
저널정보
충북연구원 지역정책연구 地域政策硏究 22卷 1號
발행연도
2011.6
수록면
13 - 28 (16page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Streams and rivers have been essential resources in human history as known of being major origins of human civilization. As urbanization occurs rapidly along with economic growth, the surrounding water environment have been substantially degraded in terms of water quality and riparian and river ecosystem health. Recent public recognition to environmental quality calls for enormous attention to restoring or retrofitting degraded stream environment. Thus, central and local government initiated ecological stream restoration projects in late 1990s. In this study, we have visited 64 select streams including streams of ecological restoration project and natural reference streams and assessed their stream environments. Stream Visual Assessment Protocol(SVAP) developed by United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS) was used to assess 10 different categories of stream environment including channel condition, hydrological status, riparian vegetation, water appearance, and flow diversity. Each of ten categories was scored from 1 to 10 and averaged to determine ecological status into one of four classification levels, ie, excellent, good, fair, and poor. Overall average score for the select streams was 6.9 which falls into "fair" classification. Among the environmental categories, the stream stability was scored the best while the barrier to fish migration was the worst. In riparian usage perspective, most of project streams lacked of stream ecological consideration by overly constructing waterfront facilities. It was recommended that the prior consideration in the stream restoration should be given to stream ecological health, especially to fish migration improvement and prudent design of waterfront facilities. Restoring stream hydrology(e.g., environmental or ecological flow) also needs to be premise of stream restoration since flowing water is part of definition of stream.

목차

Abstract
I. 서론
II. 생태하천 개념 및 복원사업 현황
Ⅲ. 하천의 생태환경 조사
Ⅳ. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0