지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
China related writings published in the Critical Review of History were as much diverse in contents as their quantity. Diverse attempts have been made ranging from those that tried to boldly point out problems in the existing learned circles of Chinese histories, in particular, the learned circles of modern/contemporary Chinese histories to those that tried to explore the possibility to describe histories encompassing the East Asia. Diverse observations, analyses and assessments of China that have been changing day by day since the reform and opening up have been also attempted. An issue in which the writers of the Critical Review of History intensively showed interest was the ideological trend of China, in particular, that of intellectuals after the reform and opening up.
In particular, they paid attention to so-called ‘the New Left’ that took a critical standpoint against ‘the Free Marketeer’ and the stream of cultural conservatism. This indicates how the writers of the Critical Review of History looked the process of the construction of the ‘Chinese Style Socialism’ and what they wanted to know from the process. Looking at China that has been rapidly growing into a great power, they tried to find out the sociocultural logic of the growth into a great power and a logic to critically think about China that has been pursuing rapid economic growth based on models of Neo-Liberalism.
In particular, they paid attention to so-called ‘the New Left’ that took a critical standpoint against ‘the Free Marketeer’ and the stream of cultural conservatism. This indicates how the writers of the Critical Review of History looked the process of the construction of the ‘Chinese Style Socialism’ and what they wanted to know from the process. Looking at China that has been rapidly growing into a great power, they tried to find out the sociocultural logic of the growth into a great power and a logic to critically think about China that has been pursuing rapid economic growth based on models of Neo-Liberalism.
목차
1. 들어가는 말
2. 중국 근현대사학계에 대한 비판
3. 개혁개방과 중국 사회주의
4. 대국화와 비판적 중국 담론
5. 동북공정과 한중관계
6. 동아시아 역사서술
7. 나오면서
참고문헌 (10)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
『역사비평』과 한국의 중국 담론의 진로
김희교
역사비평
2013
.05
북한 인민 형성에 관한 사회학자의 역사적 접근 : 『전쟁과 인민-북한 사회주의 체제의 성립과 인민의 탄생』한성훈, 지음, 돌베개, 2012.
한모니까
역사비평
2012
.11
마르크스주의 해체 이후의 탈자본주의 대안? : 『리얼 유토피아』 에릭 올린 라이트 지음, 권화현 옮김, 들녘, 2012. 『마르크스가 살아 있다면』 찰스 더버 지음, 강정석 옮김, 책읽는수요일, 2012
장석준
역사비평
2012
.11
근대성, 식민지, 보편사 : 『헤겔, 아이티, 보편사』 수전 벅모스 지음, 김성호 옮김, 문학동네, 2012
권윤경
역사비평
2012
.11
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-905-003298772