지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2012.8
- 수록면
- 73 - 102 (30page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The leadership competition has become one of the most salient features of the Latin American "new" regionalism since the 2000s. Venezuek and Mexico have actively engaged in the regionalism drive, competing against the two hegemonic powers (the USA and Brazil) in the region. As a result, various institutions have been created to deepen the different types of regional cooperation. These institutions included the Venezuelan-led Alternativa Bolivariana para la America(ALBA) and the Mexican-led Plan Mesoamerica besides the Union de Naciones Suramericanas (UNASUR) driven by the Brazilian regional leadership. Latin American "new" regionalism includes leadership competition among the two middle powers (Venezuela and Mexico) and the one major power (Brazil).
The goal of this paper is to make a modest contribution to understanding Latin American "new" regionalism by explaining the similarities and differences between Venezuela and Mexico in the current leadership of "new" regionalism, In conclusion, the expansion of American hegemonic leadership to the south in the 1990s was the primary force behind the Brazilian-led Latin American regionalism. The leadership competition among the major powers in the region created a leadership vacuum to be filled by a middle or small power. The president"s strong will and top-down decision-making are common points between Venezuela and Mexico in the regionalism leadership. Contrary to the Mexican case, Venezuela has consistently opposed the USA-led Free Trade Area Agreement of the Americas (FTAA) and has been strategically linked with Brazil in regionalism matters.
The goal of this paper is to make a modest contribution to understanding Latin American "new" regionalism by explaining the similarities and differences between Venezuela and Mexico in the current leadership of "new" regionalism, In conclusion, the expansion of American hegemonic leadership to the south in the 1990s was the primary force behind the Brazilian-led Latin American regionalism. The leadership competition among the major powers in the region created a leadership vacuum to be filled by a middle or small power. The president"s strong will and top-down decision-making are common points between Venezuela and Mexico in the regionalism leadership. Contrary to the Mexican case, Venezuela has consistently opposed the USA-led Free Trade Area Agreement of the Americas (FTAA) and has been strategically linked with Brazil in regionalism matters.
목차
ABSTRACT
서론
이론적 배경
라틴아메리카지역주의와 미주간지역주의의 전개
베네수엘라와 멕시코 주도의 ‘신’지역주의 전개과정
베네수엘라와 멕시코 지역주의 리더십의 주요 특징
결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (4)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
진단 : 중남미를 휩쓸고 있는 반미ㆍ반신자유주의 : 베네수엘라 차베스 대통령의 ‘사회주의’, ‘반미’ 노선은 성공할 것인가?
민경우
민족21
2006
.01
지역경제 통합과정과 민주화 과정의 관계 : 남미공동시장의 경우
양동훈
중남미연구
1996
.02
차베스 집권 14년의 평가와 차베스 이후 차베스주의
김기현
라틴아메리카이슈
2014
.05
녹색기후기금(GCF) 유치와 지속가능발전에 대한 연구
이태영
법과기업연구
2013
.06
라틴아메리카 신자유주의 비판과 대안탐구의 여정 : 『IMF 시대의 멕시코』에서 『대홍수』까지
김기현
라틴아메리카연구
2013
.05
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-950-003183593