지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to review and criticize of Korean language curriculum of the two biggest problems. It can be called to as the ‘field centralism’ and ‘language skill centralism’. For this purpose, this study examined the overall contents of Korean language curriculums(from 4th curriculum to 2009 curriculum) such as system of contents, explanation of standards, latest theories of language education.
As a result, the core of this study is twofold. Field centralism and language skill centralism were causing many problems of Korean language education such as irrational subjects appearance. In order to solve this problem, I think that this alternative approach is instituted. Thus, I suggest the contents structure of Korean language curriculum as an alternative. It consists of knowledge, text, language activities.
As a result, the core of this study is twofold. Field centralism and language skill centralism were causing many problems of Korean language education such as irrational subjects appearance. In order to solve this problem, I think that this alternative approach is instituted. Thus, I suggest the contents structure of Korean language curriculum as an alternative. It consists of knowledge, text, language activities.
목차
1. 들어가며
2. 국어과 영역 구분과 영역주의
3. 국어과 내용체계와 기능주의
4. 해결 방안
5. 마치며
참고문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (16)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-710-001436702