지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study describes the manner in which ‘Sinocentrism as a culture’ met ‘Sinocentrism as geography.’ The unique culture of Chos?n that originated from different areas and natural atmosphere could never be advantageous to the internalization of the Sinocentric culture. However, no one regarded Chos?n culture as being completely different or coarse. While this culture was viewed as different, it was not seen as being independent either. This was a natural difference that emerged because Chos?n was a ‘foreign land’.
Sinocentrism during late Chos?n coincided with the fracture of the notion of P?ungt?o Pudongnon(風土不同論), recognition of the different natural atmosphere of China and Korea. The belief that Chos?n was a Sinocentric land located in a foreign country that was at the heart of the move to chap P?ungt?o Pudongnon(風土不同論) was rooted in the concept of a common natural atmosphere shared with China. The difference of scale provided a special status to mainland China. However, Chos?n intellectuals took to referring to themselves as the successors of sinocentric culture when they realized that the Ming dynasty could not be restored. Nevertheless, they never abandoned their belief that a ‘Sinocentric state’ would someday be established in mainland China. While the former belief was based on the logic of destiny and reality, the latter was related to the issue of the heavenly principle(天理). Efforts to connect Chos?n with the special entity that was mainland China were regarded as being natural. They produced comparisons of the Korean peninsula to an old man bowing to mainland China. In some cases, the relationship between the Korean peninsula and mainland China was said to flow through the Liaodong peninsula.
The geographical traces of Sinocentrism during late Chos?n included Chos?n viewing the Qing dynasty as a hostile other and the perception of the imaginary Sinocentric state that would someday be established in mainland China as a civilization companion. If Song Siy?l. who lived during the fracture of the notion of P?ungt?o Pudongnon(風土不同論), was the starting point of this geographical vestige, then Yi Hangno stood at the center of the movement to identify the Eastern world as a ‘unit of civilization contradictory to the Western world.’ Yi Hangno’s theory originated from the Sinocentrism passed down from Song Siy?l.
Sinocentrism during late Chos?n coincided with the fracture of the notion of P?ungt?o Pudongnon(風土不同論), recognition of the different natural atmosphere of China and Korea. The belief that Chos?n was a Sinocentric land located in a foreign country that was at the heart of the move to chap P?ungt?o Pudongnon(風土不同論) was rooted in the concept of a common natural atmosphere shared with China. The difference of scale provided a special status to mainland China. However, Chos?n intellectuals took to referring to themselves as the successors of sinocentric culture when they realized that the Ming dynasty could not be restored. Nevertheless, they never abandoned their belief that a ‘Sinocentric state’ would someday be established in mainland China. While the former belief was based on the logic of destiny and reality, the latter was related to the issue of the heavenly principle(天理). Efforts to connect Chos?n with the special entity that was mainland China were regarded as being natural. They produced comparisons of the Korean peninsula to an old man bowing to mainland China. In some cases, the relationship between the Korean peninsula and mainland China was said to flow through the Liaodong peninsula.
The geographical traces of Sinocentrism during late Chos?n included Chos?n viewing the Qing dynasty as a hostile other and the perception of the imaginary Sinocentric state that would someday be established in mainland China as a civilization companion. If Song Siy?l. who lived during the fracture of the notion of P?ungt?o Pudongnon(風土不同論), was the starting point of this geographical vestige, then Yi Hangno stood at the center of the movement to identify the Eastern world as a ‘unit of civilization contradictory to the Western world.’ Yi Hangno’s theory originated from the Sinocentrism passed down from Song Siy?l.
목차
Ⅰ. 왜 지리적 맥락인가
Ⅱ. 풍토론의 초기 지형과 ‘외국’
Ⅲ. 풍토의 동일성과 규모의 차이
Ⅳ. 중원대륙의 위상
Ⅴ. 중원대륙과 조선
Ⅵ. 나가면서
참고문헌
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (32)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-911-001340351