메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
나덕찬 (건국대학교) 유선종 (건국대학교) 정희남 (국토연구원)
저널정보
한국주거환경학회 주거환경 住居環境 통권 제10권 제2호 (통권 제18호)
발행연도
2012.9
수록면
75 - 89 (15page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
As a part of government officials’ welfare program, the Government Employees Pension Service(GEPS) has conducted public officials’ rental housing project since 1982. At that time, GEPS purchased 510 units of houses at three regions, including Taepyeong-dong, Daejeon city, to rent public officials. Since then, the stock of public officials’ rental housing increases 3.5 times to 18,516 units of houses at 77 apartment complexes on a national scale by June 2011. Among them, about 10,000 units of houses need to be reconstructed since those rental housing was built in 1980s and thus became obsolete, and was small, less than 60 ㎡, not to accommodate the demand for more comfortable size. And thus GEPS establishes a project plan to reconstruct the rental housing.
This study is a feasibility study for the reconstruction project of government officials’ rental housing at the Godeock 8th Apartment Block as a case. In usually, housing reconstruction project is conducted pursuant to the regulations of Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents. However, the case project is unable to follow up that Act’s regulations, since that Act regulates reconstruction project, which is conducted by the housing cooperatives. The housing of the case project is rental housing owned by the government, not by individual owners who can organize the reconstruction cooperative. And thus the study recommends that the case project shall be conducted pursuant to the regulations of Housing Act.
The study reviews profitability of three alternatives; disposing of the existing houses and buying new houses, selling land after demolishing the existing rental housings, and selling new houses after reconstruction project. The study finds that the third option, selling new houses after reconstruction project, has the largest profitability.
As for the third option, the study simulates three scenarios based on housing size; Alternative 1 is that all housings are less than 85㎡, Alternative 2 is that all housings are larger than 85㎡, and Alternative 3 is that housing sizes are mixed up. And then the study surveys the market situations and calculates the profitability. To control the projet risk, the study carries out the sensitivity analyse reflecting the unit prices of land and the current situation of frozen housing market. The study finds that all three alternatives have business values, but Alternative 1 has the highest return of investment.
Considering the current recessed real estate market, consumers’ preferences for housing size and also the rate of return of investment, the study recommends Alternative 1 consisting mainly of small-sized, less than 85㎡, houses can produce the maximized profits.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 고찰
Ⅲ. 사례연구
Ⅳ. 사업성 분석
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (14)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-595-001106611