메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
정은경 (원광대학교)
저널정보
우리문학회 우리문학연구 우리文學硏究 제37집
발행연도
2012.10
수록면
523 - 560 (38page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Choi Jae-Seo"s "Satirical literary theory" was to seek for solution to overcome the literary crisis in the period of the colony. It shared the consciousness of crisis with the late 30"s satirical literary theories. But Choi Jae-Seo"s theory has characteristic that is related to "self -satire". Choi Jae-Seo"s criticism of Satirical literature has the following content. First, that is the middle literature that refuse antagonism between national literature and socialism literature. Second, "Satirical literature" is suitable for "Modern"(contemporary) which is transition period and chaotic. Third, satire reached realization. Fourth, it is related intelligence and moral. Fifth, it means bankrupt of modernism rooted in "individual".
characters, anti-romanticism and anti-humanism. Choi Jae-Seo"s "Modern" is not Korean Modern but western civilization and literature. Choi Jae-Seo"s "the real" is similar to naturalism. Intelligence and moral in his criticism has no empirical meaning. Choi Jae-Seo also pointed out the limit of intelligence which could not help getting agnosticism. As to the moral, Choi Jae-Seo didn"t direct any value. Choi Jae-Seo emphasized on "order". But he failed to established literary order, because he could not find Eliot"s tradition in Korean modern literature. He also could not find new order in colonial reality, finally he accepted new order that is Fascism.

목차

국문초록
1. 서론
2. 풍자문학론의 내용과 특징
3. ‘현대’와 ‘실재성’
4. 지성과 모랄
5. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (34)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-810-001064961