지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Whitman’s urban experiences in Manhattan are remarkably visualized by the name of ‘Mannahatta’ rather than Manhattan in his poetry. Particularly, Whitman’s recognition of Manhattan’s “shifting tableaux,” which is parallel to a “shot” in a movie camera, seems to imply a sign of modern film. Like a poet with a movie camera, Whitman’s eye sharply captures the “shifting tableaux” of Manhattan. His invariable enchantment for the rapidity and movement of the city inspires American avant-garde artists, who are predominantly called Precisionists, such as Charles Sheeler and Paul Strand. The two Precisionist artists have a keen insight into the images of Manhattan full of “rapidity of movement” in Whitman’s poetry. Their silent film Manhatta released in 1921 uses its intertitles borrowed from Whitman’s poems such as “City of Ships,” “Mannahatta,” “Song of the Exposition,” “Crossing Brooklyn Ferry,” etc. Sheeler and Strand aspire to represent the vision of Mannahatta captured through Whitman’s camera eye.
Manhatta as a cross-media work of art incorporating the image and verbal text suggests Whitman’s vision with regard to Mannahatta full of “living poems” which the poet desires. Inspired by the poem “Mannahatta,” the film captures skyscrapers, automobiles, steamers, trains, teeming streets, and crowds using geometrically precise techniques like Precisionist photography. Above all, Precisionism featuring “modern, technical, objective, hard-edged―in short, precise” perspectives has a ‘doubleness’ which is distinguished from other contemporary avant-garde movements such as Futurism and Dadaism. It is important to note that Precisionist artists desire to achieve an aesthetic of the doubleness which goes toward the abstraction and angularity of “precise” style and toward the realistic, the natural, and the organic at the same time. In short, Manhatta epitomizes the aesthetics of the Precisionist doubleness which reflects Whitman’s vision of Mannahatta. Accordingly, transcending the gap of different ages and media, Manhatta can be regarded as the Precisionist collaborations of Whitman, Sheeler, and Strand.
Manhatta as a cross-media work of art incorporating the image and verbal text suggests Whitman’s vision with regard to Mannahatta full of “living poems” which the poet desires. Inspired by the poem “Mannahatta,” the film captures skyscrapers, automobiles, steamers, trains, teeming streets, and crowds using geometrically precise techniques like Precisionist photography. Above all, Precisionism featuring “modern, technical, objective, hard-edged―in short, precise” perspectives has a ‘doubleness’ which is distinguished from other contemporary avant-garde movements such as Futurism and Dadaism. It is important to note that Precisionist artists desire to achieve an aesthetic of the doubleness which goes toward the abstraction and angularity of “precise” style and toward the realistic, the natural, and the organic at the same time. In short, Manhatta epitomizes the aesthetics of the Precisionist doubleness which reflects Whitman’s vision of Mannahatta. Accordingly, transcending the gap of different ages and media, Manhatta can be regarded as the Precisionist collaborations of Whitman, Sheeler, and Strand.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ.『맨하타』의 상호매체성
Ⅲ.『맨하타』의 정밀주의 이미지
Ⅳ. 결론
인용문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-840-000877522