지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2011.6
- 수록면
- 1 - 64 (64page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In recent Korean society, as suicide rate has greatly increased during the last decade, religions have also become seriously concerned for the problem of suicide. There recognition of suicide, however, was not always the same. This article elucidates why religious people came to have different recognition of suicide. For this, firstly, I analyse religions’ cooperative campaigns for suicide prevention. There was two sorts of the campaign: One is the campaign by the progressive religious group, and the other by the conservative religious group. The former regard suicide as a social-and-spiritual problem and, therefore, layed more stress on the social justice. For the latter, on the contrary, suicide was mere a personal-and-spiritual problem and, therefore, each person’s awareness of the pathology and fault of suicide was more emphasized. This shows that religious people’s recognition of suicide is determined not so much by religious belief as by political opinion. Secondly, I analyse two cases of religiously motivated suicide that happened in 2010, which showed both similarities and differences. The first case is Munsu, a Buddhist monk, who burnt himself to death in order to demand the President to stop the development work destroying living things. Another is a man known as “Mr. Lee,” who thought himself the incarnation of Highly God and killed himself in order to ascend to heaven where he should fight against evil gods. While Munsu’s suicide has been commemorated as a religious-and-political self-immolation both by the Buddhist community and by the progressive political camp, Mr. Lee’s suicide was soon and completely forgotten from the memory of most people. Reading Munsu’s suicide note and Mr. Lee’s diary, we can see that Munsu was worried about the suffering of living things on earth and that Mr. Lee was anxious for the suffering of spiritual beings in heaven. Reading more closely Mr. Lee’s diary, however, little difference is found between his and Munsu’s altruistic compassion for other beings. Therefore, what makes them different was not their belief or practice but the signifying behavior of the community who remembers the dead. Through such analyses, in conclusion, we can say that the relation between suicide and religion is not fixed but fluctuates according to political and communal situations.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 종교계의 자살 관련 연합 활동 : 두 흐름
Ⅲ. 종교적 동기의 이타적 자살 : 두 사례
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (120)
참고문헌 신청
1. [기타자료] - / / 경향신문, 국민일보, 동아일보, 문화일보, 세계일보, 연합뉴스, 오마이뉴스, 조선일보, 중앙일보, 프레시안, 한국일보, 한겨레신문, 그것이 알고 싶다(SBS), 당신이 궁금한 이야기(SBS)
2. [단행본] - 강영안 / 2005 / 타인의 얼굴: 레비나스의 철학 / 문학과지성사
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 강혁준 / 2009 / 자살예방을 위한 사목적 대안과 노력 / 경향잡지 (1698)
5. [학술대회논문] - 곽혜원 / 2011 / 자살문제, 어떻게 할 것인가 / 21세기교회와신학포럼
6. [단행본] - 구인회 / 2008 / 죽음과 관련된 생명윤리적 문제들 / 집문당
2. [단행본] - 강영안 / 2005 / 타인의 얼굴: 레비나스의 철학 / 문학과지성사
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 강혁준 / 2009 / 자살예방을 위한 사목적 대안과 노력 / 경향잡지 (1698)
5. [학술대회논문] - 곽혜원 / 2011 / 자살문제, 어떻게 할 것인가 / 21세기교회와신학포럼
6. [단행본] - 구인회 / 2008 / 죽음과 관련된 생명윤리적 문제들 / 집문당
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-205-000837718