메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
조영진 (이화여자대학교)
저널정보
한국국제경제법학회 국제경제법연구 國際經濟法硏究 第10卷 제2호
발행연도
2012.11
수록면
69 - 95 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper deals with the DDA negotiations on fisheries subsidies where the members have tried to explore new rules to regulate fisheries subsidies. Fisheries subsidies negotiations were launched largely by the concern for the depletion of fisheries stocks. Some members, in particular, the Friends of Fish countries, claimed that overcapacity and overfishing caused by various fisheries subsides program have resulted in the depletion, and insisted that new rules has to be introduced to the WTO to address the current situation.
After more than 5 years of negotiations, in November 2007, the Chairman of the Rules Negotiations Group, circulated a draft text for the fisheries subsides by summarizing all proposals submitted by then on his own perspective. The draft text was written in a form of annex to the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailng Measures(ASCM). While the text was supposed to provide a basis for further negotiations, it bears a few problems. First, by including subsidies provided to port infrastructure and port facilities on its list of prohibited subsidies, the draft text seems to be in conflict with the ASCM on the basic concept of “subsidies.” In addition, the draft text does not provide any clear guidance on interpreting “harm(injury),” determining causal link between subsidies and harm, or the implementation of panels’ and the Appellate Body’s recommendation. Also, it is not written coherently with the ASCM as well as other WTO Agreements such as the DSU. This is not only a structural and systemic problem but also an actual problem, as there is no guarantee that the draft text could be properly implemented for the conservation of fisheries stocks even if it was adopted by consensus of the WTO members. Lastly, with these shortcomings, the draft text does not seem to meet the requirement of the Doha mandate.
Although the DDA negotiations as a whole reached an impasse now, it may find a new momentum next year. Once the talks are resumed, members should try to address these problems, so that they can make progress in fisheries subsidies negotiations.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. WTO 보조금 협정 개관
Ⅲ. 의장초안의 문제점
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
국문초록
Abstract

참고문헌 (47)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-361-000700859