지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Legislative texts usually have ambiguous or vague formulations that might be the product of political compromises or legislator’s neglect. Practicing lawyers and judges are professionally engaged in interpreting the legislator’s intent, thus establishing the ambiguous or vague meaning of texts for application in courts. It is generally agreed that the translator has no authority to interpret uncertainties in legislative texts, since the translator is believed to have no ability to ascertain the intended meaning of the source text. However, in the actual translation process, the translator is often faced with cases that require interpretation of uncertainties in lexical and syntactic units of statutory texts. This is often the case with translators producing English translation of the Statutes of the Republic of Korea. Korean legislators use more abbreviated expressions such as deung(etc.) than legislators working under the common law system, or everyday or nontechnical vocabulary the semantic range of which is different from that of its common usage, such as muit and centered dot(·). This legislative practice might increase the risks of misinterpretation or mistranslation by Korean legal translators. In order to reduce the unnecessary burden of interpretation that is imposed on translators, Korean legislative drafters should be more cautious in using ambiguous expressions obstructing translator’s systematic understanding of texts.
목차
1. 서론
2. 이론적 배경
3. ‘등’, ‘및’, 가운뎃점(·)의 해석 문제
4. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (1)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-701-000627131