지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Contemporary historical studies have changed in terms of both their quantity and quality in a "fashionable" way. Particularly in the 1980s and 1990s, global historiography has undergone a tremendous transformation, in turn influencing the writing of "regional" national histories. Beyond the bounds of a single nation, transnational entanglements are noticeable as a fundamental way of life. The proposition that there is no single, major center of history cannot be easily refuted, because history as such shows that there are multiple, co-existent centers of history. In an era of globalism and globalization earlier, centric means of historical thinking, whether they be Eurocentric, Sinocentric, or other versions thereof are not acceptable, and cannot be taken for granted.
With a flourishing variety of methods and theories, efforts of historians to pursue objective fact-finding as a traditional goal has seriously deteriorated. When it comes to domestic scholarship, historical knowledge since 1960"s has changed to a significant degree, and has changed as much as in overseas historiography. But it may be admitted that Korean historians lacked creative thinking and productive outcomes of their efforts, despite strenuous attempts to the contrary.
The primary objective of this article is to examine the main trends in contemporary historical scholarship, both overseas and domestic, particularly since the 1960"s, and to point out hopeful directions that Korean historiography should develop in the years to come.
With a flourishing variety of methods and theories, efforts of historians to pursue objective fact-finding as a traditional goal has seriously deteriorated. When it comes to domestic scholarship, historical knowledge since 1960"s has changed to a significant degree, and has changed as much as in overseas historiography. But it may be admitted that Korean historians lacked creative thinking and productive outcomes of their efforts, despite strenuous attempts to the contrary.
The primary objective of this article is to examine the main trends in contemporary historical scholarship, both overseas and domestic, particularly since the 1960"s, and to point out hopeful directions that Korean historiography should develop in the years to come.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
II. 역사학의 일반적 동향과 한국역사학계
III. 세계주의와 중심주의
IV. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (45)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - 곽차섭 / 2000 / 미시사란 무엇인가 / 푸른 역사
2. [단행본] - 김영한 / 2006 / 근대화에 비중을 둔 서양사연구: 1960~1979, In 한국의 학술연구: 역사학 / 대한민국학술원
3. [단행본] - 김유철 / 2006 / 魏･晋에서 宋･元 시대 연구, In 한국의 학술연구: 역사학 / 대한민국학술원
4. [단행본] - 김현식 / 2006 / 산업사회로 진입과 노동사의 부상: 1980~1994, In 한국의 학술연구: 역사 학 / 대한민국학술원
5. [단행본] - 민현구 / 2002 / 발전적 한국사상의 추구와 새로운 연구방법의 모색, In 1945년 이후 한･일 양국에서의 역사연구 동향 / 한･일역사가회의 조직위원회
2. [단행본] - 김영한 / 2006 / 근대화에 비중을 둔 서양사연구: 1960~1979, In 한국의 학술연구: 역사학 / 대한민국학술원
3. [단행본] - 김유철 / 2006 / 魏･晋에서 宋･元 시대 연구, In 한국의 학술연구: 역사학 / 대한민국학술원
4. [단행본] - 김현식 / 2006 / 산업사회로 진입과 노동사의 부상: 1980~1994, In 한국의 학술연구: 역사 학 / 대한민국학술원
5. [단행본] - 민현구 / 2002 / 발전적 한국사상의 추구와 새로운 연구방법의 모색, In 1945년 이후 한･일 양국에서의 역사연구 동향 / 한･일역사가회의 조직위원회
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-911-000603733