메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이승호 (서울벤처대학원대학교) 최민섭 (서울벤처대학원대학교)
저널정보
한국주거환경학회 주거환경 住居環境 통권 제10권 제3호 (통권 제19호)
발행연도
2012.12
수록면
209 - 229 (21page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (3)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The third largest number of overseas Koreans are living in the Philippines followed by China and Japan in the Asian region. In the Philippines, Koreans rank the second largest number of foreigners next to Chinese. Since there is no survey or study targeting overseas Koreans" dwelling choice determinants and residential satisfaction, this topic would be meaningful. Most important variables from precedent researches done in Korea were chosen for this survey and analysis. Respondents to this survey were random overseas Koreans residing in Metro Manila areas.
In this study, linear model has been estimated using Hedonic approach to identify relationship between residential satisfaction and dwelling choice determinants in Metro Manila. Eight explanatory variables(locational, economic feasibility, sociality, mutuality, educational environment, comfortability, safety and view) were chosen to identify their effects on residential satisfaction. Results clearly indicated that seven explanatory variables were positively significant at 5% significance level, but insignificant economic feasibility variable rejected its hypothesis.
In other words, effects of overseas Koreans"s dwelling choice determinants on residential satisfaction were in order of safety, locational, comfortability, sociality, view, regionality, and educational environment. These estimations does not show any big difference with results from precedent researches done in Korea. However, since safety was most important factor in dwelling choice determinants, certain public safety is necessary.
Although educational environment is relatively good, it is least likely to affect residential satisfaction because Korean students are having hard time to make local friends due to communication difficulties and also it is not easy to get into good schools abroad. Due to lack of efficient infrastructure in the Philippines, expenses in electricity, communication such as phone, mobile, Internet, also fuel and toll fees were more expensive than Korea. Economic feasibility hypothesis is then rejected.

목차

Abstract
I. 머리말
II. 선행연구 고찰
III. 연구 설계
IV. 실증분석
V. 맺음말
참고문헌

참고문헌 (14)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-595-000555036