지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Examined in this paper are the articles published through Hwang"seong Shin"mun and Dae"han Mae"il Shinbo, in order to determine how the usage of the word "Mae"guk/賣國("Selling out one"s country)" changed over the passage of time, and what kind of political meanings the word was generating in different time periods.
In case of articles published through Hwang"seong Shin"mun, perpetrators of such "Mae"guk" actions were condemned as "Criminals who betrayed their own country and people." They were condemned in a rather traditional sense, which promoted "loyalty to the king" and "love of the country." On the other hand, Dae"han Mae"il Shinbo, while maintaining the above-mentioned "traditional" sense, dared to examine the concept of "Mae"guk" and "Ae"guk"("Being loyal to one"s country") from a third-party viewpoint, and cited several examples from the local regions of Korea. Also, it maintained a critical point of view upon Ilchinhoe, which was a typically pro-Japanese organization full of middle and lower class citizens, as well as the "Five Enemies of the Public(the "Eulsayear"s Criminal Five")."
The Dae"han Mae"il Shinbo"s articles, especially after 1908, show us that the actions of "Selling out one"s country" grew even more diverse, and more and more people were involved in such actions, regardless of their social statuses. Not only the high-ranking officials, but also the middlemen who served as assistants to the Military Police or people who spied on others were all highly blamed and criticized. In the process, idle people who were unintentionally involved in such actions were now considered as political activists, and the word of "Mae"guk" came to be used in the context of other forms of actions, and other kinds of quality, such as cruelly oppressing others, indulging oneself in enslaving others, or pursuing one"s office-seeking desire.
Ilchinhoe was joined by members of the society at all kinds of levels, and were fulfilling their own political needs and economical desires. In that sense, it was the perfect example of a "Mae"guk" action which was condemned by Dae"han Mae"il Shinbo. Also, Ilchinhoe was propagating that it was pro-Japanese in nature and was also "serving the [Joseon] country." Dae"han Mae"il Shinbo, based upon a more traditional sense of morality and also its view of a modern state, had to aggressively criticize the civilization movement and the "loving the country" notion of Ilchinhoe.
In case of articles published through Hwang"seong Shin"mun, perpetrators of such "Mae"guk" actions were condemned as "Criminals who betrayed their own country and people." They were condemned in a rather traditional sense, which promoted "loyalty to the king" and "love of the country." On the other hand, Dae"han Mae"il Shinbo, while maintaining the above-mentioned "traditional" sense, dared to examine the concept of "Mae"guk" and "Ae"guk"("Being loyal to one"s country") from a third-party viewpoint, and cited several examples from the local regions of Korea. Also, it maintained a critical point of view upon Ilchinhoe, which was a typically pro-Japanese organization full of middle and lower class citizens, as well as the "Five Enemies of the Public(the "Eulsayear"s Criminal Five")."
The Dae"han Mae"il Shinbo"s articles, especially after 1908, show us that the actions of "Selling out one"s country" grew even more diverse, and more and more people were involved in such actions, regardless of their social statuses. Not only the high-ranking officials, but also the middlemen who served as assistants to the Military Police or people who spied on others were all highly blamed and criticized. In the process, idle people who were unintentionally involved in such actions were now considered as political activists, and the word of "Mae"guk" came to be used in the context of other forms of actions, and other kinds of quality, such as cruelly oppressing others, indulging oneself in enslaving others, or pursuing one"s office-seeking desire.
Ilchinhoe was joined by members of the society at all kinds of levels, and were fulfilling their own political needs and economical desires. In that sense, it was the perfect example of a "Mae"guk" action which was condemned by Dae"han Mae"il Shinbo. Also, Ilchinhoe was propagating that it was pro-Japanese in nature and was also "serving the [Joseon] country." Dae"han Mae"il Shinbo, based upon a more traditional sense of morality and also its view of a modern state, had to aggressively criticize the civilization movement and the "loving the country" notion of Ilchinhoe.
목차
머리말
1. 『황성신문』의 전통적 매국론
2. 『대한매일신보』의 반일 논조와 매국당 인식
3. 『대한매일신보』 ‘친일매국론‘과 일진회 ‘친일애국론‘의 충돌
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (38)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학위논문] - 김소영 / 2009 / 대한제국기 '국민' 형성론과 통합론 연구 / 박사 / 고려대학교 대학원
2. [단행본] - 김종준 / 2010 / 일진회의 문명화론과 친일활동 / 신구문화사
3. [단행본] - 박찬승 / 1991 / 한국근대정치사상사연구 / 역사비평사
4. [학위논문] - 백동현 / 2004 / 대한제국기 민족인식과 국가구상 / 박사 / 고려대학교 대학원
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 박찬승 / 2009 / 한국 민족주의와 종족적 민족주의의 해석 - 신기욱, 『한국 민족주의의 계보와 정치』(2009, 창비) - / 역사와 현실 (72) : 339 ~ 349
2. [단행본] - 김종준 / 2010 / 일진회의 문명화론과 친일활동 / 신구문화사
3. [단행본] - 박찬승 / 1991 / 한국근대정치사상사연구 / 역사비평사
4. [학위논문] - 백동현 / 2004 / 대한제국기 민족인식과 국가구상 / 박사 / 고려대학교 대학원
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 박찬승 / 2009 / 한국 민족주의와 종족적 민족주의의 해석 - 신기욱, 『한국 민족주의의 계보와 정치』(2009, 창비) - / 역사와 현실 (72) : 339 ~ 349
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-911-000510968