개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2012.12
- 수록면
- 813 - 838 (26page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This essay attempts to rethink Coleridge’s remark, “I have a smack of Hamlet.” Coleridge has been considered as one of Shakespearean critics who was most responsible for forming the weak and irresolute image of Hamlet in the Romantic era. When he said “I have a smack of Hamlet,” people assuming that he identifies himself with Hamlet in a propensity of procreation, did not take it very seriously. Rather, they reacted depreciatingly to Coleridge’s idea of himself with a relation to Hamlet who they thought was too delicate but charming. And this kind of reaction seems to be present nowadays.
This essay, however, examines the remark from the perspective of Coleridge’s ideas of human existence and human thinking. Coleridge has both positive and negative notion of human thought. For him, thinking is the mental faculty which may lead us to discover the truth and ultimately to confront with the infinite. However, on the negative level thinking can be deteriorated to disease. As he mentions that Hamlet is the play which makes him read Shakespeare’s plays from philosophical perspective, he sees the negative function of thinking which he finds in himself in Hamlet. Hamlet’s thinking produces another one that produces another one that produces another one until this reaches nowhere, eventually ending up with sense of guilt and self reproach. This pattern of thinking also occupies Coleridge’s mind.
This negative function of thinking is responsible for a sense of incompleteness of human existence. As shown in Hamlet’s “To be or not to be” soliloquy, Hamlet’s problem is human ignorance of his life including his life before birth and after death; in other words, human ignorance of himself. With this fundamental sense of incompleteness or uncertainty, he faces necessity to clarify all the mysteries which happened including his father’s death and his mother’s hasty marriage. All his thoughts only confine him in limbo between thoughts and action instead of solving problems. Coleridge like Hamlet aims to know himself by means of thinking only to find himself prisoned in limbo between thoughts and action.
This essay, however, examines the remark from the perspective of Coleridge’s ideas of human existence and human thinking. Coleridge has both positive and negative notion of human thought. For him, thinking is the mental faculty which may lead us to discover the truth and ultimately to confront with the infinite. However, on the negative level thinking can be deteriorated to disease. As he mentions that Hamlet is the play which makes him read Shakespeare’s plays from philosophical perspective, he sees the negative function of thinking which he finds in himself in Hamlet. Hamlet’s thinking produces another one that produces another one that produces another one until this reaches nowhere, eventually ending up with sense of guilt and self reproach. This pattern of thinking also occupies Coleridge’s mind.
This negative function of thinking is responsible for a sense of incompleteness of human existence. As shown in Hamlet’s “To be or not to be” soliloquy, Hamlet’s problem is human ignorance of his life including his life before birth and after death; in other words, human ignorance of himself. With this fundamental sense of incompleteness or uncertainty, he faces necessity to clarify all the mysteries which happened including his father’s death and his mother’s hasty marriage. All his thoughts only confine him in limbo between thoughts and action instead of solving problems. Coleridge like Hamlet aims to know himself by means of thinking only to find himself prisoned in limbo between thoughts and action.
목차
I. 서론
II. 생각의 주관성과 통제 불능성
III. 인식의 불확실성
IV. 결론
인용문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (27)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - 가와이 쇼이치로 / 2009 / 햄릿의 수수께끼를 풀다 / 시그마북스
2. [단행본] - 여석기 / 2008 / 나의 햄릿 강의 / 생각의 나무
3. [단행본] - Beer, John / 1989 / Coleridge’s Originality as a Critic of Shakespeare, In Coleridge’s Theory of Imagination Today / AMS Press : 147 ~ 165
4. [단행본] - Bradley, A.C / 1963 / From Shakespearean Tragedy, In The Signet Classic hakespeare / The New American Library : 200 ~ 211
5. [단행본] - Carlson,Richard / 1895 / Stop Thinking Start Living, In London: HarperCollins, 2012. Coleridge, Samuel Taylor / London
2. [단행본] - 여석기 / 2008 / 나의 햄릿 강의 / 생각의 나무
3. [단행본] - Beer, John / 1989 / Coleridge’s Originality as a Critic of Shakespeare, In Coleridge’s Theory of Imagination Today / AMS Press : 147 ~ 165
4. [단행본] - Bradley, A.C / 1963 / From Shakespearean Tragedy, In The Signet Classic hakespeare / The New American Library : 200 ~ 211
5. [단행본] - Carlson,Richard / 1895 / Stop Thinking Start Living, In London: HarperCollins, 2012. Coleridge, Samuel Taylor / London
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-840-000511398