지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
There are increasing doubts about the objectivity and fairness of the science of historical writing since the late 20th century. An alternative approach is oral history based on direct experience and memory. Oral history can be defined as a methodology encompassing all history written on the basis of oral interview, i.e., oral records and written accounts based on these. In Korea where recording has traditionally been hampered by cultural objections, laws and taboos, it was inevitable that the historians turned their attention to oral history. Interest in oral history has grown rapidly from the urgency to record as much as possible in order to preserve living memories that would otherwise be lost with the death of those being interviewed.
Oral history introduces subjectivity and presentness into the writing of history because it is based on personal experience and memory. It also realizes the possibility of subversion through the (re)organization of memories that may be contrary to the official record promulgated by institutionalized history. It is important to focus on the possibilities that oral history can open up in order to meaningfully explore alternative history writing. One cannot write all history using only oral history, but this method can certainly make an important contribution to the democratization of history writing by adding personal reminiscences that would otherwise be lost, by illuminating those aspects of history interpretation that may differ from official history, and by restoring those fluid and multi-faceted historical facts that are too often not dealt with by the science of modern historical writing.
Oral history introduces subjectivity and presentness into the writing of history because it is based on personal experience and memory. It also realizes the possibility of subversion through the (re)organization of memories that may be contrary to the official record promulgated by institutionalized history. It is important to focus on the possibilities that oral history can open up in order to meaningfully explore alternative history writing. One cannot write all history using only oral history, but this method can certainly make an important contribution to the democratization of history writing by adding personal reminiscences that would otherwise be lost, by illuminating those aspects of history interpretation that may differ from official history, and by restoring those fluid and multi-faceted historical facts that are too often not dealt with by the science of modern historical writing.
목차
1. 과학적 지식으로서의 역사에 대한 회의
2. 구술 아카이브 구축과 ‘보존할 가치가 있는 기억’
3. 경험과 기억으로 쓰는 역사
4. 구술사 연구방법과 구술사의 위험성
5. ‘진실한 회상’을 통한 역사쓰기
참고문헌
참고문헌 (17)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-900-002376316