메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이희종 (한양대학교)
저널정보
한양법학회 한양법학 한양법학 제41집
발행연도
2013.2
수록면
509 - 535 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Over the last three decades the concept of social enterprise has grown dramatically in many regions of the world. Social Enterprise has very important value under the social conditions in modern society. The notion of social enterprise first appeared in Italy in the late 1980s, but it really began to be used at the European level in the mid-1990s.
Social enterprises are not-for-profit private organizations providing goods or services directly related to their explicit aim to benefit the community. Social enterprises do not aim to offer any benefit to their investors, except where they believe that doing so will ultimately further their capacity to realize their social and environmental goals.
In 1991, the Italian Parliament adopted a law creating a specific legal form for these “social solidarity co-operatives”-which were subsequently renamed “social co-operatives”. Moreover, a new legal form, the “Community Interest Company” (CIC), was approved by the British Parliament in 2004. The CIC legal form includes a community interest test and an asset lock to ensure that the new entity is dedicated to its expressed community purposes. Both in Italy and in the UK, social enterprises are thus embedded in the third sector. They are defined by their social purpose and the limitation on the distribution of profit they impose upon themselves.
This first step was followed in 2006 by the enactment of the Social Enterprise Promotion Act in Korea. Organizations that want to obtain the certification should have one of the following legal forms: an associative corporation registered under the civil law; a company registered under the Commercial Act; a non-profit private organization, a consumer co-operative or a welfare corporation registered according to the laws defining those three last forms.
Some social enterprises can earn a profit that is sufficient to get the business funded by investors. But many, if not most, social enterprises cannot fund themselves entirely through sales or investment. Many stock company exists as the social company in Korea. Dividends are distribution of profit or earning to shareholders. The social enterprise and stock company can be collide the conceptual phase. Thus we must amend Social Enterprise Promotion Act.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 사회적기업의 정의와 각국의 현황
Ⅲ. 사회적기업의 이익 분배
Ⅳ. 주식회사 형태의 사회적기업의 이익 분배
Ⅴ. 결론
【참고문헌】
【Abstract】

참고문헌 (40)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문과 연관된 판례 (1)

  • 헌법재판소 2001. 11. 29. 선고 2001헌바4 전원재판부

    가.지방공사의 직원에게는 공무원에 버금가는 정도의 청렴성과 그 직무의 불가매수성(不可買收性)이 요구되고, 이 사건 법률조항은 이를 보호하고 담보하기 위한 것이므로 입법목적의 정당성이 인정되며, 위 입법목적 달성을 위하여 그 직원을 형법상의 뇌물죄 규정의 적용에 있어서 공무원으로 의제하는 형식을 취하였다 하여 이를 부적절하다고 단정할 수는 없

    자세히 보기

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-300-003121055