지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
DBpia Top 10%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article examines some techniques of rule that the Ottoman empire employed to project its power over the centuries. And it explores the interaction of internal and external factors that led to the rise and demise of the Ottoman empire. The central dynastic Ottoman state employed a variety of strategies to assure its own perpetuation. Especially as the multi-ethnic, multi-religious Ottoman empire, state power relied on an effective and tolerant model of a multi-religious political system that governed inter-communal relations in the Ottoman empire for centuries. The state’s primary concerns were not religious but rather political: to maintain and extend its power by whatever means necessary. So Ottoman empire showed an exceptional flexibility, a readiness and ability to pragmatically adapt to changing conditions.
In earlier centuries, the Ottoman social and political order had been based on differences among ethnicities, religions, and occupations. Peaceful relations among Ottoman subjects were the norm over most of the period and the Ottoman system worked relatively well for almost all of its history. But in a series of three enactments between 1829 and 1856, the central state aimed to strip away the differences among Ottoman subjects. It is clear, after all, that inter-subject relations in the 19th-century Ottoman empire were far worse than in the past. It was the main factor that led to the demise of the Ottoman empire which was one of the greatest, most extensive, and longest-lasting empires in history.
In earlier centuries, the Ottoman social and political order had been based on differences among ethnicities, religions, and occupations. Peaceful relations among Ottoman subjects were the norm over most of the period and the Ottoman system worked relatively well for almost all of its history. But in a series of three enactments between 1829 and 1856, the central state aimed to strip away the differences among Ottoman subjects. It is clear, after all, that inter-subject relations in the 19th-century Ottoman empire were far worse than in the past. It was the main factor that led to the demise of the Ottoman empire which was one of the greatest, most extensive, and longest-lasting empires in history.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가기: 제국의 장기지속 비결
Ⅱ. ‘통합’을 위한 제국의 통치 시스템 만들기(1300-1683)
Ⅲ. 흔들리는 제국 통치 시스템 ‘보완’하기(1683-1789)
Ⅳ. 신민들의 ‘저항’과 제국 통치 시스템의 와해(1789-1922)
Ⅴ. 나가기: 제국 통치 시스템의 실패
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (39)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - Abou-El-Haj, Rifaat / 1991 / The Formation of the Modern State / State University of New York Press
2. [단행본] - Akgündüz, Ahmed / 1995 / Islam Hukuku'nda Kölelik-Cariyelik Müessesesi ve Osmanlı'da Harem / OSAV
3. [단행본] - Akgündüz, Ahmet / 1990 / Osmanlı Kanunmameleri, I / Fey Vakfı
4. [단행본] - Alikılıç, Dündar / 2004 / Osmanlı'da Devlet Protokolü ve Törenler: İmparatorluk Seremonisi / Tarih Düşünce Kitapları
5. [단행본] - Arslan, Mehmed / 1999 / Türk Edebiyatında Manzum: Sûrnameler / Atatürk Kültür Merkezi Başbakanlığı Yayınları
2. [단행본] - Akgündüz, Ahmed / 1995 / Islam Hukuku'nda Kölelik-Cariyelik Müessesesi ve Osmanlı'da Harem / OSAV
3. [단행본] - Akgündüz, Ahmet / 1990 / Osmanlı Kanunmameleri, I / Fey Vakfı
4. [단행본] - Alikılıç, Dündar / 2004 / Osmanlı'da Devlet Protokolü ve Törenler: İmparatorluk Seremonisi / Tarih Düşünce Kitapları
5. [단행본] - Arslan, Mehmed / 1999 / Türk Edebiyatında Manzum: Sûrnameler / Atatürk Kültür Merkezi Başbakanlığı Yayınları
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-910-003112490