지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper examines ‘the meaning of differences: Jumong narrative represented in the historical materials of Korea and China.’, which is a part of the study of ‘A Genealogical Approach to the Jumong Narrative in the Discourse of Nationalism in Korea and China’. This paper, which is based on the premise that "each text that reflects the times is the original text", aims to explore the space of memory of author and his age.
While intensively analyzingWeishu(A.D. 554, Beiqi), Samguk Sagi(A.D. 1145, Koryeo), Gwanggaeto Stele(A.D. 414, Koguryeo), with investigation of Jumong narrative of each text in a spatio-temporal context, I drew following conclusions. First, Jumong was different status in each text; Gwanggaeto Stele＞Samguk Sagi＞Weishu, specifically, Jumong’s absolute status in the Gwanggaeto Stele. Second, Gwanggaeto Stele, describing Jumong as the ‘son of Heaven’, indicates that Koguryeo is the center of the world. However, this view may create a contradiction with the sinocentrism of China. Therefore, China is absent in Gwanggaeto Stele. Likewise, a record that describes Jumong as the ‘son of Heaven’ is absent in the historical materials of China. Third, the phenomenon that Jumong brought to the fore and was considered as Dongmyeong during Koryeo Dynasty is associated with historical awareness and identity construction of Koryeo. In conclusion, the greatness and the holiness of Jumong deriving from the different narrative points of view on him depends more on historical situation than on the fact itself.
The ultimate goal of this study is to investigate the space of memory of our own now. Jian Koguryeo Stele, which has been recently discovered, shows signs of a new round of the ‘history war’ between Korea and China. It is the most urgent necessity for us to reflect our attitudes toward history which would distort the interpretation of ancient texts.
While intensively analyzingWeishu(A.D. 554, Beiqi), Samguk Sagi(A.D. 1145, Koryeo), Gwanggaeto Stele(A.D. 414, Koguryeo), with investigation of Jumong narrative of each text in a spatio-temporal context, I drew following conclusions. First, Jumong was different status in each text; Gwanggaeto Stele＞Samguk Sagi＞Weishu, specifically, Jumong’s absolute status in the Gwanggaeto Stele. Second, Gwanggaeto Stele, describing Jumong as the ‘son of Heaven’, indicates that Koguryeo is the center of the world. However, this view may create a contradiction with the sinocentrism of China. Therefore, China is absent in Gwanggaeto Stele. Likewise, a record that describes Jumong as the ‘son of Heaven’ is absent in the historical materials of China. Third, the phenomenon that Jumong brought to the fore and was considered as Dongmyeong during Koryeo Dynasty is associated with historical awareness and identity construction of Koryeo. In conclusion, the greatness and the holiness of Jumong deriving from the different narrative points of view on him depends more on historical situation than on the fact itself.
The ultimate goal of this study is to investigate the space of memory of our own now. Jian Koguryeo Stele, which has been recently discovered, shows signs of a new round of the ‘history war’ between Korea and China. It is the most urgent necessity for us to reflect our attitudes toward history which would distort the interpretation of ancient texts.
목차
1. 동일한 대상, 상반된 해석
2. 한·중 고대 사료에 보이는 주몽서사의 차이
3. 주몽서사의 차이에 담긴 의미
4. 사라진 글자의 진실
〈參考文獻〉
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (36)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-800-003600269