지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2012.7
- 수록면
- 1 - 215 (215page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
It is no surprise that all developed countries and many developing ones around the world are in a fiercer green race for responding climate change issues and achieving promised low-carbon societies. The Korean government has met the strong needs for “low carbon, green growth” to cope with global climate changes, and is introducing the various policies for accelerating renewable energy generation systems.
Seoul city had already prepared the grand vision for both climate protection and renewable energy generation initiative in 2030, thereby serving Seoul in implementing effective and practical actions in order to achieve its emission reduction and renewable energy production goals by 2030. In addition, Seoul city has recently announced the new movement to sustainable energy planning, “world-leading climate and environment capital city, Seoul”, including strategies of production of renewable energy, energy efficiency, citizen participation, and capacity building. These are expressed in forms of 10 core projects, resulting in energy savings and production effects equivalent to electricity generation of 1 nuclear power plant.
Considering many local governments around the world, from the viewpoints of self-supporting energy system, have made it a policy priority to generate renewable energy, it’s more or less imperative for Seoul to follow such streams. Based on the current mandatory implementation of RPS system since 2012 year, the purpose of this study is given to possible introduction of Seoul-typed FIT system, as a subsidiary policy tool, thereby bringing a host of benefits to Seoul city’s renewable energy generation plan. Thus, Switching to cleaner energy sources, such as solar photovoltaic system of roof-top, might contribute to a better renewable energy production, and at the same time relieve Seoul’s dependence on fossil fuel-based energy.
For possible introduction of Seoul-typed FIT with co-existence of RPS system, this study points out the comparative concluding remarks for solar photovoltaic in Seoul as follows：①subsidy to installation of solar photovoltaic system, ②additional support in proportion to amounts of traded REC, ③maintenance cost supporting of solar light equipment, and ④financial support with cheap capital. With the mandatory implementation of RPS policy, more preferred way might be the additional support in proportion to amounts of traded REC with co-existence of both RPS and Seoul-typed FIT system.
Seoul city had already prepared the grand vision for both climate protection and renewable energy generation initiative in 2030, thereby serving Seoul in implementing effective and practical actions in order to achieve its emission reduction and renewable energy production goals by 2030. In addition, Seoul city has recently announced the new movement to sustainable energy planning, “world-leading climate and environment capital city, Seoul”, including strategies of production of renewable energy, energy efficiency, citizen participation, and capacity building. These are expressed in forms of 10 core projects, resulting in energy savings and production effects equivalent to electricity generation of 1 nuclear power plant.
Considering many local governments around the world, from the viewpoints of self-supporting energy system, have made it a policy priority to generate renewable energy, it’s more or less imperative for Seoul to follow such streams. Based on the current mandatory implementation of RPS system since 2012 year, the purpose of this study is given to possible introduction of Seoul-typed FIT system, as a subsidiary policy tool, thereby bringing a host of benefits to Seoul city’s renewable energy generation plan. Thus, Switching to cleaner energy sources, such as solar photovoltaic system of roof-top, might contribute to a better renewable energy production, and at the same time relieve Seoul’s dependence on fossil fuel-based energy.
For possible introduction of Seoul-typed FIT with co-existence of RPS system, this study points out the comparative concluding remarks for solar photovoltaic in Seoul as follows：①subsidy to installation of solar photovoltaic system, ②additional support in proportion to amounts of traded REC, ③maintenance cost supporting of solar light equipment, and ④financial support with cheap capital. With the mandatory implementation of RPS policy, more preferred way might be the additional support in proportion to amounts of traded REC with co-existence of both RPS and Seoul-typed FIT system.
목차
[표지]
[표제지]
[영문요약]
[요약 및 정책건의]
[목차]
표목차
그림목차
[제1장 연구개요]
제1절 연구배경 및 목적
제2절 연구내용 및 방법
[제2장 서울시 신재생에너지 보급현황 및 보급기반 여건분석]
제1절 신재생에너지 보급현황 및 관련계획 검토
제2절 서울형 에너지 자립기반 확충 인식 설문조사
[제3장 신재생에너지 보급정책 비교분석]
제1절 신재생에너지 보급정책 현황
제2절 발전차액지원제도와 신재생에너지 공급의무화제도의 비교 분석]
제3절 신재생에너지 공급의무화제도(RPS)의 영향 검토
제4절 종합정리
[제4장 해외 주요국가 및 도시의 신재생에너지 보급정책 동향]
제1절 선진국의 FIT 및 RPS 운영사례
제2절 주요도시의 FIT 및 RPS 운영사례
제3절 시사점
[제5장 서울형 햇빛발전지원제도 도입방안]
제1절 태양광 발전 경제성 분석 모델
제2절 서울형 햇빛발전지원제도 도입방안
제3절 서울형 발전차액지원제도 확대 운영방안
[제6장 결론]
[참고문헌]
[부록]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
시스템다이내믹스를 이용한 신재생에너지 정책 비교에 관한 연구 : 발전차액지원제도와 의무할당제도를 중심으로
이동성
,
문태훈
국토계획
2015
.10
신재생에너지 시장 확대를 위한 정책수단의 비교 : 가격정책과 수량정책의 정책결합
권태형
한국정책과학학회보
2014
.06
서울형 햇빛발전지원제도 도입방안
김운수
정책리포트
2013
.01
해외 RPS시행사례 분석 및 시사점
황순현
,
우필성
,
권종환
외 2명
대한전기학회 학술대회 논문집
2012
.05
[해외전력산업 동향] 독일 신재생에너지 지원정책 추이와 시장 변화
임금주
전기저널
2016
.07
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-350-002601076