지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2011.10
- 수록면
- 96 - 104 (9page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Assuming that different spatial types involves the change of observation time to acquire the spatial information, this study intended to analyze the observation time by interior space types and derive the proper time for spatial evaluation. Coming to the study method, in order to analyze the characteristics of observation time in the image evaluation of interior space by types, it looked into the observation time chosen by the testees during evaluation. The findings of this study are as follows:
First, the observation time differed by genders and spatial types: men’s average time was longest for modern (93.3 sec.) and natural (89.4 sec.) spaces; women’s average time was longest for classic space (110.7 sec.), which was the shortest for men. Second, the intensity of observation time zone differed by spatial types: this finding can imply that different design types require different establishment of observation time for evaluation even if the spatial elements are the same. Third, analyzing the distribution of time zones chosen by most testees showed that men’s observation time zones were more intensely distributed than those of women. Fourthly, the observation time for general space could be derived from the gender-based comparison that excluded the difference by types, but considering that different design types lead to different observation time, it could be seen as proper for evaluation of interior space to establish the difference of observation time by spatial types. Finally, Analysis showed the highest preference to the time ‘③’. However, obtaining information presented is the most highly effective time is ‘⑥’. Thus, the preferred time zone is different and effective, according to the results of the analysis.
First, the observation time differed by genders and spatial types: men’s average time was longest for modern (93.3 sec.) and natural (89.4 sec.) spaces; women’s average time was longest for classic space (110.7 sec.), which was the shortest for men. Second, the intensity of observation time zone differed by spatial types: this finding can imply that different design types require different establishment of observation time for evaluation even if the spatial elements are the same. Third, analyzing the distribution of time zones chosen by most testees showed that men’s observation time zones were more intensely distributed than those of women. Fourthly, the observation time for general space could be derived from the gender-based comparison that excluded the difference by types, but considering that different design types lead to different observation time, it could be seen as proper for evaluation of interior space to establish the difference of observation time by spatial types. Finally, Analysis showed the highest preference to the time ‘③’. However, obtaining information presented is the most highly effective time is ‘⑥’. Thus, the preferred time zone is different and effective, according to the results of the analysis.
목차
Abstract
1. 서론
2. 연구방법
3. 이미지의 정보획득과 주시시간 특성
4. 유형에 따른 주시시간의 특성 분석
5. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (2)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
실내공간의 디자인유형에 나타난 성별 지각특성에 관한 연구
손광호
,
최계영
한국실내디자인학회 논문집
2012
.08
노인요양시설 공용생활공간의 안내표식 시스템에 관한 연구
정미렴
,
김대년
한국실내디자인학회 논문집
2009
.10
국내 종합병원의 공용공간에서 나타나는 군집유형과 이용행태에 관한 조사 연구
손지혜
,
양내원
한국실내디자인학회 논문집
2009
.10
노인전문병원 평면구조의 위계에 관한 연구
이행우
,
김석태
한국실내디자인학회 논문집
2009
.10
1990년 이후 한국 개신교회의 예배유형에 따른 예배공간특성 : 전통예배공간과 현대예배공간을 중심으로
김기현
,
이규백
한국실내디자인학회 논문집
2009
.10
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-610-002535229