지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2013.2
- 수록면
- 85 - 96 (12page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study relates to meta-phenomena in architectural design. Among others, this study aims to interpret and demonstrate the cognitive thoughts and methodological systems in ‘autonomy and instrumentality’ presented in works of art by positivist architects focusing on diagrams after the second modernity in addition to earlier formal experiments by John Hejduk, Peter Eisenman, Bernard Tschumi, and Daniel Libeskind. In order to achieve these aims, this study approached the mimetic concepts developed by Walter Benjamin and Theodor Adorno.
Especially, meta-phenomena in the methods of architectural design were connected to productivity in Adorno’s mimetic concepts. Also, in terms of formation and creation of works of art, the mimetic backgrounds of Adorno’s theories on aesthetics were identified from features of concepts on the part of formal experiments.
The results were systemized methodologically based on meta-phenomena appearing in pure arts and overall architectural design. These were presented as a framework to interpret ‘autonomy and instrumentality’ that exist in the working of negativity and mimesis. In this way, logics and intuition in architectural design as well as methodological systemization of convergent creativity were proved valid.
In conclusion, Adorno’s mimetic concepts systemized based on negativity and critical awareness may lead to new concepts. It has been proved that it is valid for security of meta-phenomena of architectural design as a production of autonomous spaces for differences and creation.
Especially, meta-phenomena in the methods of architectural design were connected to productivity in Adorno’s mimetic concepts. Also, in terms of formation and creation of works of art, the mimetic backgrounds of Adorno’s theories on aesthetics were identified from features of concepts on the part of formal experiments.
The results were systemized methodologically based on meta-phenomena appearing in pure arts and overall architectural design. These were presented as a framework to interpret ‘autonomy and instrumentality’ that exist in the working of negativity and mimesis. In this way, logics and intuition in architectural design as well as methodological systemization of convergent creativity were proved valid.
In conclusion, Adorno’s mimetic concepts systemized based on negativity and critical awareness may lead to new concepts. It has been proved that it is valid for security of meta-phenomena of architectural design as a production of autonomous spaces for differences and creation.
목차
Abstract
1. 서론
2. 아도르노 부정미학의 메타성
3. 개념발생(고안)과 미메시스적 계기
4. 건축디자인 메타성과 미메시스적 계기
5. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌
참고문헌 (15)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
건축디자인에 나타난 전복적 미메시스의 표현특성 연구 : 전유, 전용을 중심으로
박영태
한국실내디자인학회 논문집
2013
.04
건축공간의 리얼리즘 기술미학에 대한 연구 : ‘부정성과 미메시스적 계기’를 중심으로
박영태
,
이영수
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2012
.12
아도르노의 미학이론과 베케트 : ‘부정사유’와 ‘자율적 예술의 정치성
윤화영
현대영미드라마
2010
.04
네덜란드 RE;USE 디자인의 창발성과 변증적 사유방식
박영태
한국실내디자인학회 논문집
2014
.02
배가스 열회수 히트펌프 시스템 실증을 통한 운전특성 분석
이승호
,
이관수
,
이길봉
외 3명
대한설비공학회 학술발표대회논문집
2013
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0