메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이중효 (한려대학교)
저널정보
역사학회 역사학보 歷史學報 第218輯
발행연도
2013.6
수록면
105 - 130 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Ye-Jong’s political intention to reform Kuk-Ja-Gam made Moon-Sin become passive in operating Chil-Jae and criticize King’s advisers in regards to accepting Sam-Sa-Jae.
Ye-Jong granted Moo-Hak-Je-Seng who took Moo Gwa exam a pass according to their scores regardless of the success or failure which made Moo-Hak-Je attractive to many students. Moon-Sin saw Moo-Hak-Je’s growth as Ye-Jong’s political intention to restrain them and felt uncomfortable.
Ahn-In Han, King’s closest advisor, conducted Moo Gwa exam in 15-year of Ye-Jong, and King’s will to select Moo-Hak-Je-Seng was reflected. Yoo-Gu Kim and Tan-Ji Lee, whose fathers were low-level government officials, were Moo-Hak-Je-Seng who passed Moo Gwa exam, and they were chosen to be the rising power by Ahn-In Han. The fact that students who received education from Moo-Hak-Je could enter into government office through Moo Gwa exam concerned Moon-Sin.
Gye-Gyung Moon-Sin abolished Moo-Hak-Je and Moo Gwa as Kuk-Ja-Gam-Seng began political activity together with Seo-Kyung force. It clearly showed their opposition to In-Jong’s attempt to restore Hak-Nyong and reformation of Ye-Jong’s Kuk-Ja-Gam.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 7재 운영과 文臣의 견제
Ⅲ. 文臣의 武學齋 폐지 주장과 이유
Ⅳ. 맺는말
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]

참고문헌 (32)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-910-003311582