메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국프랑스사학회 프랑스사 연구 프랑스사 연구 제29호
발행연도
2013.8
수록면
57 - 90 (34page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article explores the meaning and function of the Education Bills, which had been presented to the National Assembly from 1791 to 1795, such as Talleyrand’s bill, Condorcet’s bill, Lanthenas’s bill, Lakanal’s bill, Romme’s bill, the decree of frimaire, the legislation of brumaire(an III) and the decree of brumaire(an IV). The following three conclusions are drawn from this research.
First, the evolution of Education bills is similar to the course of the Revolution. The Revolution did not stop radicalizing. The terror and the revolutionary government were the height of this radicalization (Romm’s bill). The Revolution became conservative and reactionary after the coup d’Etat of thermidor(the decree of brumaire). Secondly, the fact that Lakanal’s bill and the decree of frimaire don’t correspond to the general trend can be explained taking into consideration not only the conflict and compromise between clans but also the personal relations between deputies. Thirdly, the ecclesiastics, who had monopolized the education more than a thousand years and did not want to renounce their monopoly, interfered with the organization of public instruction, frustrating its attempt to renovate education.
This article ends with the conclusion that the education bills did fail. But, thanks to the seeds sown by these bills, true public instruction was organized about 100 years later.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 교육안 분석
Ⅲ. 맺는말
Resume
Summary

참고문헌 (25)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-920-002429430