지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Since Korean competition law was adopted in 1980, Korean competition policy and law have developed significantly through accepting foreign legal techniques and economic ideas with modifications. In particular, there are some distinctive competition law provisions that do not exist in the US and the EU, such as the provision concerning the presumption of market dominance, stated in Article 4 of the MRFTA. This clarifies the scope of application of Article 3-2 on enterprises that hold a market dominant position. This is originally from the German competition rules that influence competition laws in Korea and Japan since the presumption clauses provide legal certainty which is important for a competition jurisdiction with a civil-law system.
Most Asian competition regimes provide a presumption of market dominance based on market share threshold or concentration ratio. Although this presumption can offer a benefit of legal certainty, it may also cause some problems, such as a strait-jacket effect, which refers to the situation where a competition law is concerned with forms rather than effects. A stringent legal framework of market dominance presumption may result in this problem. Therefore, a case-by-case approach may be necessary in a certain scrutiny on abuse of market dominance. Since this provision of presumption was adopted in 1999, quite a number of cases have been examined under the existing presumption method. However, there has been almost no case of discussing revocation of presumption.
This article aims to discuss the current approach of presumption of dominance which is very different from those in the Western countries, such as the US and the EU; these regimes do not have the problem of lack of case law. It, then, provides proposals for a better competition policy of assessments on market dominance.
Most Asian competition regimes provide a presumption of market dominance based on market share threshold or concentration ratio. Although this presumption can offer a benefit of legal certainty, it may also cause some problems, such as a strait-jacket effect, which refers to the situation where a competition law is concerned with forms rather than effects. A stringent legal framework of market dominance presumption may result in this problem. Therefore, a case-by-case approach may be necessary in a certain scrutiny on abuse of market dominance. Since this provision of presumption was adopted in 1999, quite a number of cases have been examined under the existing presumption method. However, there has been almost no case of discussing revocation of presumption.
This article aims to discuss the current approach of presumption of dominance which is very different from those in the Western countries, such as the US and the EU; these regimes do not have the problem of lack of case law. It, then, provides proposals for a better competition policy of assessments on market dominance.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. The Meaning of A Market Dominant Position
Ⅲ. Theorising the Presumption of A Market Dominant Position
Ⅳ. Concluding Remarks
<국문초록>
참고문헌 (64)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - Akman, Piner / / The Concept of Abuse in EU Competition Law / Hart Publishing
2. [단행본] - Armstrong, Mark / 2007 / Two-Sided Markets: Economic Theory and Policy Implications, In Recent Developments in Antitrust / MIT Press
3. [단행본] - Baker, Jonathan B. / 2008 / Economic Evidence in Antitrust: Defining Markets and Measuring Market Power, In Handbook of Antitrust Economics / MIT Press
4. [단행본] - Bishop, Simon / 2010 / The Economics of EC Competition Law, 3rd edn / Sweet & Maxwell
5. [단행본] - Blair, Roger D. / 2009 / Antitrust Economics, 2nd edn / Oxford University Press
2. [단행본] - Armstrong, Mark / 2007 / Two-Sided Markets: Economic Theory and Policy Implications, In Recent Developments in Antitrust / MIT Press
3. [단행본] - Baker, Jonathan B. / 2008 / Economic Evidence in Antitrust: Defining Markets and Measuring Market Power, In Handbook of Antitrust Economics / MIT Press
4. [단행본] - Bishop, Simon / 2010 / The Economics of EC Competition Law, 3rd edn / Sweet & Maxwell
5. [단행본] - Blair, Roger D. / 2009 / Antitrust Economics, 2nd edn / Oxford University Press
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
Competition Laws on Tie-in Sales in the New Economy
Yo Sop Choi
강원법학
2015
.10
Competition Law on Refusal to Deal of Abuse of Market Dominance in Korea : POSCO Revisited
Yo Sop Choi
법학연구
2014
.12
A Critical Review of Competition Law on Abuse of Market Dominance in The Southeast Asian Developing Countries : A Comparative Perspective
Choi Yo Sop
강원법학
2014
.02
The Goals of EU Competition Law : A Query on the Socio-Political Policy Goals
Choi
,
Yo-Sop
법학연구
2011
.05
공동의 시장지배와 과점규제 : EU 경쟁법상의 논의와 시사점
이효석
법학연구
2011
.02
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-300-002857536