지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 동양사학회 동양사학연구 東洋史學硏究 第124輯
- 발행연도
- 2013.9
- 수록면
- 61 - 100 (40page)
- DOI
- 10.17856/jahs.2013.09.124.61
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study aims to analyze the characteristics of Tombstone Prohibition Order promulgated in Jian An 10 and the background reasons for the prevalence of tombstones in the Later Han Dynasty Period.
Generally, tombstones represented burials with ceremonies including full honours and the order of tombstone prohibition was understood as prohibition of such kind of burials. However, as most of the tombstones had been put by many people, especially by followers or subordinates of the dead, not necessarily by direct descendents, it is somewhat difficult to regard all tombstones as an expression of such procedures. Especially, when the standardization process of components of tombstones is examined, it is evident that the people who put the tombstones had a very close connection with elections. In other words, the people who put the tombstones were keen on earning a reputation which would benefit them in the elections.
Therefore, the Tombstone Prohibition Order of Cao Cao(曹操) can also be considered as aiming something more than just prohibition of erecting tombstones. Because erecting a tombstone itself had a connotation for political intention, the tombstone prohibition order cannot be regarded as simply stopping tombstones to be put. Cao Cao, by prohibiting the erection of tombstones, wanted not only to stop personal criticisms that happened at the tombstone erection ceremonies but also to prohibit any other political behavior of nobility that might have been happening in the unreachable area of power. Such tombstone prohibition order was passed down to Western Jin Dynasty that prohibited any private authority other than the central government. On the other hand, this series of situation needed an alternative in place of tombstones to commemorate and to show respect of the living towards the dead. That is how the underground epitaph has appeared in earnest in the society of China.
Generally, tombstones represented burials with ceremonies including full honours and the order of tombstone prohibition was understood as prohibition of such kind of burials. However, as most of the tombstones had been put by many people, especially by followers or subordinates of the dead, not necessarily by direct descendents, it is somewhat difficult to regard all tombstones as an expression of such procedures. Especially, when the standardization process of components of tombstones is examined, it is evident that the people who put the tombstones had a very close connection with elections. In other words, the people who put the tombstones were keen on earning a reputation which would benefit them in the elections.
Therefore, the Tombstone Prohibition Order of Cao Cao(曹操) can also be considered as aiming something more than just prohibition of erecting tombstones. Because erecting a tombstone itself had a connotation for political intention, the tombstone prohibition order cannot be regarded as simply stopping tombstones to be put. Cao Cao, by prohibiting the erection of tombstones, wanted not only to stop personal criticisms that happened at the tombstone erection ceremonies but also to prohibit any other political behavior of nobility that might have been happening in the unreachable area of power. Such tombstone prohibition order was passed down to Western Jin Dynasty that prohibited any private authority other than the central government. On the other hand, this series of situation needed an alternative in place of tombstones to commemorate and to show respect of the living towards the dead. That is how the underground epitaph has appeared in earnest in the society of China.
목차
머리말
Ⅰ. 後漢末 立碑 행위의 성행
Ⅱ. 士大夫의 弔祭 행위와 立碑 활동
Ⅲ. 禁碑令의 반포와 의미
맺음말-墓誌의 출현에 대하여
참고문헌
참고문헌 (87)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-900-002855489