메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
장박진 (국민대)
저널정보
고려대학교 아세아문제연구원 아세아연구 아세아연구 통권 153호
발행연도
2013.9
수록면
23 - 64 (44page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
After Independence, there has been the conflict between South Korea and Japan on whether Japanese rule against Korea was legal or not, and beneficial or not for the Korean people. And the conflict was institutionalized by the Article2(a) in the Peace Treaty with Japan, and the Article2 in the Treaty on Basic Relations between South Korea and Japan, which all made the legal character of Japanese rule vague.
The purpose of this paper is to clarify the origin of the conflict by analysing the processes in liquidating the problems after the Second World War, especially the recognition of US on the independence of Korea. That US recognition on independence of Korea is important is because the character of the independence of Korea in fact realized by US makes the authoritative interpretation on the Japanese rule against Korea. If US had declared the annexation of Korea by Japan had been illegal, the postwar conflict on the character of the colonial rule between two countries would have disappeared, because defeated Japan had no rights against the US interpretation, at least in the declarations and the peace treaty which were related with the termination of the war .
This study analyses the US recognition on the independence of Korea from the post war programming during the war, which made the logical basis of the Korea independence, to the Peace Treaty with Japan which practically terminated the independence problems, and clarifies US has been consistent in that the problem of Korean independence for US was strategical in geopolitics and to manage the safety in Korean peninsula and Far East.
In other words, this paper demonstrates US had no any interests in deciding the character of Japanese rule against Korea in the actual position that Japan had ruled the Korean peninsula legitimately, and that caused the post war conflict on the character of the colonial rule between Korea and Japan.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 전시 미국의 전후 구상과 한반도 독립 문제
Ⅲ. 일본 항복 전후의 한반도 독립 문제
Ⅳ. 대일평화조약 기초 과정과 한반도 독립 문제
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-900-002821114