지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
After Independence, there has been the conflict between South Korea and Japan on whether Japanese rule against Korea was legal or not, and beneficial or not for the Korean people. And the conflict was institutionalized by the Article2(a) in the Peace Treaty with Japan, and the Article2 in the Treaty on Basic Relations between South Korea and Japan, which all made the legal character of Japanese rule vague.
The purpose of this paper is to clarify the origin of the conflict by analysing the processes in liquidating the problems after the Second World War, especially the recognition of US on the independence of Korea. That US recognition on independence of Korea is important is because the character of the independence of Korea in fact realized by US makes the authoritative interpretation on the Japanese rule against Korea. If US had declared the annexation of Korea by Japan had been illegal, the postwar conflict on the character of the colonial rule between two countries would have disappeared, because defeated Japan had no rights against the US interpretation, at least in the declarations and the peace treaty which were related with the termination of the war .
This study analyses the US recognition on the independence of Korea from the post war programming during the war, which made the logical basis of the Korea independence, to the Peace Treaty with Japan which practically terminated the independence problems, and clarifies US has been consistent in that the problem of Korean independence for US was strategical in geopolitics and to manage the safety in Korean peninsula and Far East.
In other words, this paper demonstrates US had no any interests in deciding the character of Japanese rule against Korea in the actual position that Japan had ruled the Korean peninsula legitimately, and that caused the post war conflict on the character of the colonial rule between Korea and Japan.
The purpose of this paper is to clarify the origin of the conflict by analysing the processes in liquidating the problems after the Second World War, especially the recognition of US on the independence of Korea. That US recognition on independence of Korea is important is because the character of the independence of Korea in fact realized by US makes the authoritative interpretation on the Japanese rule against Korea. If US had declared the annexation of Korea by Japan had been illegal, the postwar conflict on the character of the colonial rule between two countries would have disappeared, because defeated Japan had no rights against the US interpretation, at least in the declarations and the peace treaty which were related with the termination of the war .
This study analyses the US recognition on the independence of Korea from the post war programming during the war, which made the logical basis of the Korea independence, to the Peace Treaty with Japan which practically terminated the independence problems, and clarifies US has been consistent in that the problem of Korean independence for US was strategical in geopolitics and to manage the safety in Korean peninsula and Far East.
In other words, this paper demonstrates US had no any interests in deciding the character of Japanese rule against Korea in the actual position that Japan had ruled the Korean peninsula legitimately, and that caused the post war conflict on the character of the colonial rule between Korea and Japan.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 전시 미국의 전후 구상과 한반도 독립 문제
Ⅲ. 일본 항복 전후의 한반도 독립 문제
Ⅳ. 대일평화조약 기초 과정과 한반도 독립 문제
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-900-002821114