지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
WTO law is characterized by a notably expanded coverage compared to GATT law. Since the establishment of the WTO in 1995. WTO law’s material density and reach has been further extended. In particular, it was recognized that WTO law touches in many ways upon human rights issues. With regard to the relationship between international trade law represented by the WTO law in particular and international human rights, positive and negative perspectives have been advanced.
Vigorous claims were made to transform the WTO order into human rights oriented organizations. Some commentators were of the opinion that human rights law could be integrated into WTO law via the interpretative rules of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. This article tries to evidence that such claims and attempts are inherently flawed. There is no possibility, nor even an observable need, to transform the WTO system into a human rights institution. After examining the many areas of interaction between international trade and human rights, it is evidenced that the many common ends of each branch of international law are best served if both areas of law are mutually coordinated but at the same time maintain their essential autonomous nature. This approach may be called the norm-harmonized perspective.
Vigorous claims were made to transform the WTO order into human rights oriented organizations. Some commentators were of the opinion that human rights law could be integrated into WTO law via the interpretative rules of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. This article tries to evidence that such claims and attempts are inherently flawed. There is no possibility, nor even an observable need, to transform the WTO system into a human rights institution. After examining the many areas of interaction between international trade and human rights, it is evidenced that the many common ends of each branch of international law are best served if both areas of law are mutually coordinated but at the same time maintain their essential autonomous nature. This approach may be called the norm-harmonized perspective.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 통상과 인권의 관계가 담고 있는 형상
Ⅲ. 통상과 인권의 관계에 대한 적극적 관점
Ⅳ. 통상과 인권의 관계에 대한 소극적 관점
Ⅴ. 통상과 인권의 규점조화적 관점
Ⅵ. 결론
【참고문헌】
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-300-002796214