지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
On the Korean peninsula where freedom of thought is still not guaranteed rights, the two Koreas, exist in a confrontational relationship of hatred and pity in which each emphasizes the other’s faults. Internalized division consciousness suppressed the most fundamental right of the people to resist non-democratic dictatorial power. But even though the circumstances of the division re-organized all aspects of daily life and culture in the South and North, there was a long period of stagnation in academic circles before the division was addressed as a research topic.
The goal of this paper is to outline the trajectories of heterogeneous discourses of national culture commonly shared by Koreans in the 1970s, and read them within the context of the national division. The primary objects of analysis are state-led ‘national culture’, the ‘national culture’ built by intellectual groups, and a third, still different ‘national culture’ embodied in the journal Bburi gipeun namu(Deep-rooted tree). It ultimately asks if an ‘national culture’ discourse was possible that guaranteed criticality and communication, without being co-opted by official logics of nationalism, or becoming absorbed in ideal imperatives.
The goal of this paper is to outline the trajectories of heterogeneous discourses of national culture commonly shared by Koreans in the 1970s, and read them within the context of the national division. The primary objects of analysis are state-led ‘national culture’, the ‘national culture’ built by intellectual groups, and a third, still different ‘national culture’ embodied in the journal Bburi gipeun namu(Deep-rooted tree). It ultimately asks if an ‘national culture’ discourse was possible that guaranteed criticality and communication, without being co-opted by official logics of nationalism, or becoming absorbed in ideal imperatives.
목차
1. 한국학의 부상과 ‘민족문화’담론
2. 관제 내셔널리즘의 ‘민족문화’ 전유 : 제도화와 체제경쟁
3. 비판적 ‘민족문화’ 담론과 분단인식
4. 분단시대의 ‘한’과 ‘민중’
5. 맺으며
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (3)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0