지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2013.6
- 수록면
- 21 - 26 (6page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Recently, as the concern over environmental problem has been serious all over the world, carbon has become a key issue to mitigate the problem. In the field of Architecture, various sustainable assessment systems and LCCO2 assessment strategies have been developed, guiding low carbon building while planning. However, assessment system for low carbon neighborhood, which can be more efficient strategy, is still in the stage of research.
In this paper, as a research for low carbon assessment system and planning guideline for neighborhood, scope meeting domestic condition has been set and sustainable assessment system for neighborhood, which is similar to low carbon concept, have been compared. LEED-Neighborhood Development, BREEAM-Communities, CASBEE-Urban Development, and GBCC-Apartment Houses were used for comparison. As a result, it is found that those systems has many differences in judging system, aggregating method, scope of evaluation, and relations with a building assessment system. The concern about carbon is not insufficient yet.
Finally, assessment system for low carbon neighborhood, which is not only for establishing the plan, but also for giving guideline at the very first state of the plan, should be developed as fast as passible. With the result of this paper, establishment of assessment criteria and the way to measure quantitative CO2 should be studied forward.
In this paper, as a research for low carbon assessment system and planning guideline for neighborhood, scope meeting domestic condition has been set and sustainable assessment system for neighborhood, which is similar to low carbon concept, have been compared. LEED-Neighborhood Development, BREEAM-Communities, CASBEE-Urban Development, and GBCC-Apartment Houses were used for comparison. As a result, it is found that those systems has many differences in judging system, aggregating method, scope of evaluation, and relations with a building assessment system. The concern about carbon is not insufficient yet.
Finally, assessment system for low carbon neighborhood, which is not only for establishing the plan, but also for giving guideline at the very first state of the plan, should be developed as fast as passible. With the result of this paper, establishment of assessment criteria and the way to measure quantitative CO2 should be studied forward.
목차
1. 서론
2. 동향 및 선행연구
3. 근린주구의 정의 및 평가범위
4. 국내 외 근린단위 친환경 인증제도 비교
5. 근린단위 탄소평가 항목 비교
6. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
한국과 일본의 교원양성기관 평가인증제 비교 연구 : 교직대학원과 교육대학원을 중심으로
金寶林
일본문화학보
2015
.02
국내외 친환경건축물 인증제도 실내 환경 관련 부문 비교분석 및 개선안 연구
조한
한국실내디자인학회 논문집
2006
.08
초고층 복합 건물의 에너지 저감 설계 기술
임재한
,
김광우
건축
2012
.04
부산광역시 공동주택 사례를 통한 국내 친환경건축물 인증제도와 일본 CASBEE의 에너지 부문 비교분석 및 개선방안 연구
김승희
,
조영주
,
이정재
한국건축친환경설비학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2011
.10
국내 친환경건축물 인증제도와 LEED의 평가항목 비교 연구 : 업무시설을 중심으로
이현우
,
최창호
한국태양에너지학회 논문집
2011
.02
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-600-002710388