지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper aimed 1) to compare the length of Korean geminate vs single consonant sounds produced by Korean, Japanese and Australian speakers and 2) to analyze Korean liquid geminate vs single sound pronunciations produced by Japanese learners who do not have geminate liquids in their L1.
The Japanese Beginner Group, whose L1 has a length distinction between geminate and single consonants as in Korean. produced length ratios closer to those of Koreans than the Australian Intermediate Group did. This showed that L1 influence was stronger than the experience of L2 learning. Even though Japanese learners (both the Beginner Group and the Experienced Group) could well distinguish Korean geminate and single obstruents and nasals in their production. their phonetic realization of liquid geminate and single sounds was neither clear nor similar to that of Koreans. Clear phonetic, not phonological, differences in quality between similar sounds in L1 and L2 seems to be an obstacle for L2 learners which cannot be overcome in a short time. The geminate structure of the sounds seems to give L2 learners more difficulties when they produce them.
The Japanese Beginner Group, whose L1 has a length distinction between geminate and single consonants as in Korean. produced length ratios closer to those of Koreans than the Australian Intermediate Group did. This showed that L1 influence was stronger than the experience of L2 learning. Even though Japanese learners (both the Beginner Group and the Experienced Group) could well distinguish Korean geminate and single obstruents and nasals in their production. their phonetic realization of liquid geminate and single sounds was neither clear nor similar to that of Koreans. Clear phonetic, not phonological, differences in quality between similar sounds in L1 and L2 seems to be an obstacle for L2 learners which cannot be overcome in a short time. The geminate structure of the sounds seems to give L2 learners more difficulties when they produce them.
목차
1. 서론
2. 예측
3. 1차 실험 : 호주인과 한국인의 한국어 단자음 / 겹자음 길이 측정실험
4. 2차 실험 : 일본인의 한국어 단자음 / 겹자음 길이 측정실험
5. 실험 결과
6. 토론 및 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (39)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 구현옥 / 1996 / 소리이음에 대한 계층음절 음운론적 접근 / 동아어문논집 6 : 125 ~ 146
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 권성미 / 2012 / L1-L2 간 발음 규칙의 상이성에 따른 한국어 종성비음 습득 양상 연구 / 우리어문연구 (42) : 63 ~ 90
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 기세관 / 1997 / 여수방언 개관 / 남도문화연구 6 : 29 ~ 65
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김선미 / 1991 / 겹받침 줄이기 / 언어연구 4 : 47 ~ 56
5. [단행본] - 김선철 / 2003 / 표준 발음 실태 조사 / 국립국어연구원
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 권성미 / 2012 / L1-L2 간 발음 규칙의 상이성에 따른 한국어 종성비음 습득 양상 연구 / 우리어문연구 (42) : 63 ~ 90
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 기세관 / 1997 / 여수방언 개관 / 남도문화연구 6 : 29 ~ 65
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김선미 / 1991 / 겹받침 줄이기 / 언어연구 4 : 47 ~ 56
5. [단행본] - 김선철 / 2003 / 표준 발음 실태 조사 / 국립국어연구원
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-700-002644051